Information Privacy and Marketing: What the U.S. Should (and Shouldn't) Learn from Europe

189 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Privacy Concerns Versus Desire for Interpersonal Awareness in Driving the Use of Self-Disclosure Technologies: The Case of Instant Messaging in Two Cultures (2011, background): “of measurement as information privacy concerns [74, 106-107].”
Privacy and Attitudes Towards Internet-Based Selection Systems: A Cross-Cultural Comparison (2003, background): “No such legal requirements exist in the US, where (some of) these rights are only granted in limited contexts in certain industries (Smith, 2001).”
Information Privacy Research: An Interdisciplinary Review (2011, background): “Assigning fundamental rights to personal information would result largely in an opt-in market for information sharing, whereby firms would have access to the information only of those consumers who chose to make it available (Smith 2001).”
International Differences in Information Privacy Concerns: A Global Survey of Consumers (2004, unknown): “Smith et al. (1996) reviewed the various aspects of information privacy concerns and found that four dimensions summarize these concerns.”
The Value of Privacy Assurance: An Exploratory Field Experiment (2007, background): “Their study was conducted in Europe, which generally has stronger legal protections of privacy (Smith 2001).”