International Differences in Information Privacy Concerns: A Global Survey of Consumers

By Steven Bellman, Eric J. Johnson, Stephen J. Kobrin, Gerald L. Lohse. The Information Society, 2004

589 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f8d9dacd5904f98e6c21b4eca30ec3cb2203d6c1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Privacy Concerns Versus Desire for Interpersonal Awareness in Driving the Use of Self-Disclosure Technologies: The Case of Instant Messaging in Two Cultures (2011, background): “One study found that masculinity positively affected information privacy concerns [77], whereas another found the opposite [9].”
Recruiting Participants With Programming Skills: A Comparison of Four Crowdsourcing Platforms and a CS Student Mailing List (2022, background): “Different populations of users are well-known to differ culturally, have different biases, and different expectations [5, 6, 53].”
Adoption of Electronic Health Records in the Presence of Privacy Concerns: The Elaboration Likelihood Model and Individual Persuasion (2009, background): “Other tests of CFIP indicate that differences in cultural values influence one's Internet privacy concerns (Bellman et al. 2004), and that there is a tradeoff between a desire for personalization of products and purchasing experiences, and providing too much information, which could compromise…”
Pile of Law: Learning Responsible Data Filtering from the Law and a 256GB Open-Source Legal Dataset (2022, background): “And privacy expectations may vary widely across countries [10].”
The 'Privacy Paradox' in the Social Web: The Impact of Privacy Concerns, Individual Characteristics, and the Perceived Social Relevance on Different Forms of Self-Disclosure1 (2014, unknown): “…2009; Lewis et al., 2008; Thelwall, 2008; Tufekci, 2008; Yao et al., 2007; Yao & Zhang, 2008; Youn & Hall, 2008), cultural background (Bellman et al., 2004; Cong, 2007), level of activity (Lewis et al., 2008) and Internet experiences (Bellman et al., 2004; Yao et al., 2007; Yao & Zhang, 2008).”
Information Privacy Research: An Interdisciplinary Review (2011, background): “Bellman et al. (2004) found that participants from countries with omnibus privacy regulation had greater desire for more regulation than participants from countries with sectoral regulation, while participants from countries with sectoral privacy regulation had less desire for more regulation than…”
Privacy in the Digital Age: A Review of Information Privacy Research in Information Systems (2011, background): “The heavy use of CFIP even after an alternative was shown to work better could be the result of two situations: either research had already started when IUIPC was published, or CFIP is viewed as the de facto measure for information privacy concerns.”
Internet Privacy Concerns: An Integrated Conceptualization and Four Empirical Studies (2013, methodology): “Tables 2 and 3 report the means of the four dimensions and their intercorrelations respectively in published empirical studies (i.e., Bellman et al. 2004; Malhotra et al. 2004; Milberg et al. 2000; Rose 2006; Van Slyke et al. 2006).”