How Does Bureaucracy Impact Individual Creativity? A Cross-Level Investigation of Team Contextual Influences on Goal Orientation–Creativity Relationships
By Giles Hirst, D. van Knippenberg, Chin-hui Chen, C. Sacramento. 2011
414 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9db3b4eea9941022be8a4237e6c1cc80327699f3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- R. Speklé
- Dirk De Clercq
- Dimo Dimov
- Sally K. Widener
- Narongsak (Tek) Thongpapanl
- H. V. Elten
- Jeffery S. McMullen
- James C. Hayton
In Social Psychology
- Oya Erdil
- Dirk De Clercq
- Dimo Dimov
- Sally K. Widener
- Narongsak (Tek) Thongpapanl
- H. V. Elten
- R. Speklé
Citations in the corpus
- The Influence of Authentic Leadership on Creativity and Innovativeness (2013, background): “Studies showed that creative individuals are more innovative and employee creativity has an important role for organizational innovation (Hirst et al, 2011).”
- Creativity and Control: A Paradox. Evidence from the Levers of Control Framework (2017, positive): “This research has concluded that feelings of autonomy matter, but that the work environment itself plays a significant role, too (e.g., Amabile and Pillemer 2012; Anderson et al. 2014; Hirst et al. 2011).”
- Organizational Social Capital, Formalization, and Internal Knowledge Sharing in Entrepreneurial Orientation Formation (2013, background): “The reliance on formal procedures, plans, and policies in the firm’s decision making should establish a hierarchical system, in which top management has greater authority to steer the behavior of individual managers toward the status quo, which limits the latter’s creativity and innovation (Burns & ”