Organizational Social Capital, Formalization, and Internal Knowledge Sharing in Entrepreneurial Orientation Formation

By Dirk De Clercq, Dimo Dimov, Narongsak (Tek) Thongpapanl. 2013

277 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/86f8fdc9c46b0681a093c40abf51b8345ca525b3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Reconceptualizing entrepreneurial orientation (2015, background): “Specifically, De Clerq et al. (2013) hypothesized that the positive relationship between knowledge sharing and EO is greater when formalization is low (i.e., formalization negatively moderates the knowledge sharing-EO path).”
From social capital to entrepreneurial orientation: The mediating role of dynamic capabilities (2017, methodology): “In the present study, following the study by De Clercq et al. (2013), we adopted the dimensional approach.”
Perceptions of Adverse Work Conditions and Innovative Behavior: The Buffering Roles of Relational Resources (2016, methodology): “Knowledge sharing routines create multiple pathways to the effective development and application of innovative ideas (De Clercq et al., 2013), which can help divert anticipated resistance to such ideas due to covert political forces.”
Business risk management in the context of small and medium-sized enterprises (2020, background): “The level of a company’s competitiveness is largely based on two main factors of the competitive environment: customers and competitors (De Clercq et al., 2013).”
The Long‐Term Impact of Entrepreneurial Self‐Efficacy and Entrepreneurial Orientation on Venture Performance (2019, methodology): “As with prior studies testing for common method variance (De Clercq, Dimov, and Thongpapanl 2013), we compared the v2 values for our final model with one identical to the final model with the exception of having a common method factor.”