Time for Reflection: A Critical Examination of Polychronicity

By Cornelius J. Konig, Mary J. Waller. 2010

164 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Information Systems and Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a1cdae3dca4c0daa1177f530764eaf74cfac9853

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. D. Kirchberg
2. Laura K. Poff
3. Giovanni Circella
4. Robert A. Roe
5. W. van Eerde
6. Patricia L. Mokhtarian

In Information Systems and Management

1. D. Kirchberg
2. Laura K. Poff
3. Giovanni Circella
4. Robert A. Roe
5. W. van Eerde
6. Patricia L. Mokhtarian

In Social Psychology

1. W. van Eerde
2. D. Kirchberg
3. Laura K. Poff
4. Giovanni Circella
5. Robert A. Roe
6. Patricia L. Mokhtarian
7. P. Singleton
8. J. De Vos

Citations in the corpus

• Polychronicity and Multitasking: A Diary Study at Work (2015, methodology): “Theoretical Implications In the past, polychronicity has sometimes been equated to multitasking, a practice that has been criticized on conceptual grounds (König & Waller, 2010; Poposki & Oswald, 2010).”
• A Conceptual Typology of Multitasking Behavior and Polychronicity Preferences (2012, methodology): “This approach leaves it to (1) the respondents to choose a unit, which may vary from one question to the next in a way unpredictable for the analyst; (2) the analyst to apply an assumption of what unit people have in mind, which may lead to ambiguities in interpretation (König and Waller, 2010); and”