Does Corporate Social Responsibility Influence Firm Performance of Indian Companies?

By Supriti Mishra, Damodar Suar. 2010

852 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/98337ebc1940523a316fcac1e28b291dabe30344

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Marketing

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Corporate social responsibility, board of directors, and firm performance: an analysis of their relationships (2014, background): “The positive impact of CSR on firm value may be explained because performing this type of activities is a strategic tool for obtaining profit (Mishra and Suar 2010; Porter and Kramer 2006).”
Firm ownership and board characteristics: Do they matter for corporate social responsibility disclosure of Indian companies? (2015, background): “A long line of research has burgeoned over the years (Gray et al., 1987; Roberts, 1992; Kolk, 2008; Mishra and Suar, 2010), indicating CSR disclosures as being a function of corporate characteristics (e.g. industry affiliation, financial performance, firm size, etc.), general contextual factors…”
Does Corporate Social Responsibility Lead to Improve in Firm Financial Performance? Evidence from Malaysia (2014, methodology): “For example, Ngwakwe (2009) used CSRD on Employee Health and Safety (EHS), Waste Management (WM) and Community Development (CD) meanwhile Mishra and Suar (2010) used CSRD on employee, customer, supplier, community and environment dimension.”
Corporate social responsibility research: the importance of context (2016, background): “Environmental reporting by Indian corporations.”
Corporate Governance and Executive Compensation for Corporate Social Responsibility (2015, positive): “…by firms, we calculate the total number of KLD strengths minus concerns over a set of categories measuring CSR (variable CSRLEVEL), following the convention used by previous empirical studies (Griffin and Mahon, 1997; Waddock and Graves, 1997; Johnson and Greening, 1999; Mishra and Suar, 2010).”
Corporate social responsibility, the cost of equity capital and ownership structure: An analysis of Chinese listed firms (2015, methodology): “In addition, we also construct a CSR index based on Xu and Yang (2010), Mishra and Suar (2010) and Cheung et al. (2012).”
Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: The mediating role of marketing competence and the moderating role of market environment (2015, background): “Previous studies tended to treat CSR as a uni-dimensional construct (Mishra & Suar, 2010), limiting its power to explain the roles of different stakeholders on firm performance.”
A Meta-Analytic Review of Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Financial Performance (2016, neutral): “…& Zahir, 2008; Soana, 2011), (b) content analysis (Aras, Aybars, & Kutlu, 2010; Karagiorgos, 2010), (c) surveys (Brik, Rettab, & Mellahi, 2011; Mishra & Suar, 2010), (d) social auditing database (J. Choi & Wang, 2009; Godfrey et al., 2009), and (e) a proxy variable such as corporate…”
Entrepreneurial leadership, performance, and sustainability of micro-enterprises in Malaysia (2018, background): “In addition, Mishra and Suar [74] purported to establish a positive link between firm performance and corporate sustainability.”
Effects of corporate environmental responsibility on financial performance: The moderating role of government regulation and organizational slack (2017, methodology): “Return on Assets (ROA) was regarded as an authentic measure of CFP and was widely used (Mishra and Suar, 2010; Clarkson et al. 2013).”
Impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance Information on Economic Performance: Evidence of a Corporate ‘Sustainability Advantage’ from Europe (2019, background): “Actually, some scholars argue that firm size has no relevant influence on this field of study [50], but other studies suggest that the effects of CSR policies carried out by stock-listed (and therefore bigger) companies show more relevant consequences than non-stock-listed ones [51].”
Value-Enhancing Capabilities of CSR: A Brief Review of Contemporary Literature (2014, background): “…the potential effects of these activities on ﬁrm proﬁtability as well as ﬁrm value (Fogler & Nutt, 1975; Alexander & Buchholz, 1978; Cochran & Wood, 1984; McGuire et al., 1988 & Krausz, 1996; Grifﬁn & Mahon, 1997; Russo & Fouts, 1997; Elias, 2004; Mishra & Suar, 2010; Linthicum et al., 2010, etc.).”
Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Countries as an Emerging Field of Study (2018, neutral): “…Employee commitment and engagement (Albdour and Altarawneh 2012; Ligeti and Oravecz 2009; workplace relations (Mishra and Suar 2010), personnel development (Mishra and Suar 2010) Positive firm-specific benefits Long-term business benefits: (Atakan and Eker 2007; Henisz et al. 2014;…”
How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction (2015, background): “The findings are rather inconclusive and misleading (Margolis & Walsh, 2003; Mishra & Suar, 2010; Vogel, 2005).”
DOES ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE PERFORMANCE INFLUENCE ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE? (2020, background): “In addition, the findings supported the studies which concluded that social performance has a positive influence on the economic performance (Dhaliwal et al., 2011; Mishra & Suar, 2010; Surroca & Tribó, 2008).”
A decade's debate on the nexus between corporate social and corporate financial performance: a critical review of empirical studies 2002–2011 (2014, methodology): “…Barnett and Salomon, 2006; Zheng, 2006 Authors selfdefined CSP-> Accounting-based CFP Positive Simpson and Kohers, 2002; Callan and Thomas, 2009; Mishra and Suar, 2010; Byus et al., 2010; Chen and Wang, 2011; Pae and Choi, 2011 3803 0.510 0.250 Positive Not significant Choi and Jung, 2008;…”
Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Competitive Performance in Spanish Smes: Empirical Evidence from a Stakeholders’ Perspective * (2016, background): “In regards to the inner model of relational improvements, the adequacy of the multi-stakeholder approach used has been confirmed (Porter and Kramer, 2006; Bhattacharya et al., 2009; Mishra and Suar, 2010).”