Trust, Dependency, and Control in the Contemporary Organization
By Carole V. Wells, D. Kipnis. 2001
86 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9abaa5b1873752b77376b08e1cebd70933d9a2ba
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- T. R. Crook
- Herman Aguinis
- James G. Combs
- Dave J. Ketchen
- Harjinder Gill
- Brian L. Connelly
- J. Boles
- Frédérique E. Six
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Antecedents of trust in supervisors, subordinates, and peers (2011, background): “For instance, subordinates must rely on their supervisor for work assignments, performance evaluations, and opportunities for promotion ( Wells and Kipnis, 2001”
- Competence- and Integrity-Based Trust in Interorganizational Relationships: Which Matters More? (2018, background): “We did not include relationship duration because IORs often endure without integrity-based trust, for instance, if one partner is highly dependent on the other (Wells & Kipnis, 2001).”
- Antecedents Of Trust: Establishing A Boundary Condition For The Relation Between Propensity To Trust And Intention To Trust (2005, unknown): “relationships among organizational members (Bromiley & Cummings, 1995; Kwang & Burgers, 1997; Wells & Kipnis, 2001 ).”
- An empirical test of trust-building processes and outcomes in sales manager-salesperson relationships (2003, background): “In a nonsales context, Wells and Kipnis (2001) examined the impact of different influence tactics and interaction on subordinate trust in their managers.”
- Building interpersonal trust within organizations: a relational signalling perspective (2007, background): “The current literature is contradictory regarding the relation between trust and control, whether these are strictly alternatives or complementary (Bradach and Eccles 1989; Ring and Van de Ven 1994; Das and Teng 1998; Knights et al. 2001; Wells and Kipnis 2001).”