An interactionist perspective on dominance‐submission: Interpersonal dominance as a dynamic, situationally contingent social skill

By Judee K. Burgoon, Norah E. Dunbar. 2000

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/999a9004cbead006edbd9660c7b21fa19ee803c8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Language and Linguistics

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Relational Uncertainty and Message Processing in Marriage (2007, methodology): “Then, we trained teams of advanced undergraduate students to rate the relational messages of husbands and wives during each oneminute interval of conversation (following Burgoon & Dunbar, 2000; Burgoon & Le Poire, 1999; Guerrero, 1996).”
Perceptions of power and interactional dominance in interpersonal relationships (2005, methodology): “Although power and dominance are clearly connected, we have argued elsewhere (Burgoon & Dunbar, 2000; Burgoon, Johnson, & Koch, 1998; Dunbar, 2004) that power and dominance should be regarded as separate constructs.”
Why interpersonal dominance and affiliation matter: an interaction analysis of the coach-client relationship (2013, background): “Instead of putting it on a level with ‘force’ or ‘coercion’ (e.g. Aguinis, Simonsen, & Pierce, 1998), we follow the notion to conceptualise dominance as assertiveness and self-confident behaviour (Burgoon & Dunbar, 2000; Jacobs & Scholl, 2005).”
Theory in Progress: Dyadic Power Theory: Constructing a Communication-Based Theory of Relational Power (2004, background): “Although some scholars view dominance as a personality trait, in the context of communication, it is a dynamic state that reflects a combination of individual temperament and situational features that demand or encourage dominant behavior (Aries, Gold, & Weigel, 1983; Burgoon & Dunbar, 2000).”
Does Participation Affect Deception Success? A Test of the Interactivity Principle (2001, background): “Subsequently, three trained coders rated Persons A’s nonverbal behavior for each of the four topics on a series of 7-interval bipolar adjective scales employed in previous research to measure interactional adaptation, involvement, dominance, and pleasantness (e.g., Burgoon & Dunbar, 2000; Burgoon,”