Perceptions of power and interactional dominance in interpersonal relationships
By Norah E. Dunbar, Judee K. Burgoon. 2005
302 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/97456384d627ae9b9dcf98e3f8f896056e2a6429
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Language and Linguistics
- Stefan Benus
- Agustin Gravano
- Daniel Gatica-Perez
- Julia Hirschberg
- Jeremy N. Bailenson
- F. Clément
- Hugo Mercier
- Gabriel Skantze
In Social Psychology
- Daniel Gatica-Perez
- Julia Hirschberg
- Jeffry A. Simpson
- Jeremy N. Bailenson
- M. Oriña
- F. Clément
- Hugo Mercier
- Alexander J. Rothman
In Sociology and Political Science
- Daniel Gatica-Perez
- Jeffry A. Simpson
- Jeremy N. Bailenson
- Kimberly A. Crossman
- André Berchtold
- Hugo Mercier
- Alexander J. Rothman
- Jennifer L. Hardesty
Citations in the corpus
- Power and social influence in relationships. (2015, background): “Dunbar and Burgoon (2005) proposed that this association is curvilinear, with the most control attempts occurring in relationships in which partners have equal power, given that individuals with low power should change their own behavior to meet their high-power partner’s desires without the high-po”
- Placing Coercive Control at the Center: What Are the Processes of Coercive Control and What Makes Control Coercive? (2017, background): “Theorists argue that power, control, and even manipulation are not inherently malicious (Dunbar, 2004) but can become so when partners’ needs and goals conflict or are unmet (Dunbar & Burgoon, 2005).”
- Pragmatic aspects of temporal accommodation in turn-taking (2011, background): “Following dyadic power theory (Dunbar and Burgoon, 2005), we assume that the dominance of an individual depends on the submissiveness of other participants as negotiated during a conversation.”
- Automatic nonverbal analysis of social interaction in small groups: A review (2009, background): “Nonverbal displays of dominance involve sound and motion [40].”
- Nonverbal overload: A theoretical argument for the causes of Zoom fatigue. (2021, background): “And the amount of gaze in a face-to-face social interaction depends on a myriad of contextual features, for example, the structural features of the room as well as power dynamics among people (Dunbar & Burgoon, 2005).”
- How Preschoolers Use Cues of Dominance to Make Sense of Their Social Environment (2015, background): “Compared with the abundant literature in social psychology (Bente, Leuschner, Issa, & Blascovich, 2010; Dunbar & Burgoon, 2005; Sidanius, 2001), experimental research in developmental psychology on this topic is surprisingly scarce, even though dominance is an important Correspondence should be…”