Theory in Progress: Dyadic Power Theory: Constructing a Communication-Based Theory of Relational Power

By Norah E. Dunbar. 2004

146 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/75015c6fc32f0702ba1177ec6805d3367b18a42e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Language and Linguistics

1. Judee K. Burgoon
2. Gerben A. van Kleef
3. Norah E. Dunbar

In Social Psychology

1. Gerben A. van Kleef
2. Michael W. Kraus
3. Dacher Keltner
4. Judee K. Burgoon
5. Norah E. Dunbar
6. Serena Chen
7. Stéphane Côté
8. A. S. R. Manstead

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Michael W. Kraus
2. Gerben A. van Kleef
3. Dacher Keltner
4. Judee K. Burgoon
5. Serena Chen
6. Norah E. Dunbar
7. A. S. R. Manstead
8. Stéphane Côté

Citations in the corpus

• Perceptions of power and interactional dominance in interpersonal relationships (2005, background): “Although power and dominance are clearly connected, we have argued elsewhere (Burgoon & Dunbar, 2000; Burgoon, Johnson, & Koch, 1998; Dunbar, 2004) that power and dominance should be regarded as separate constructs.”
• A Reciprocal Influence Model of Social Power: Emerging Principles and Lines of Inquiry (2008, background): “Discursive reputation emerges in active, face-to-face communication amongst group members, in such processes as gossip (Ben-Ze’ev, 1994; Dunbar, 2004; Emler, 1994), teasing (Keltner et al.”
• NONVERBAL EXPRESSIONS OF DOMINANCE AND POWER IN HUMAN RELATIONSHIPS (2006, background): “Decades of scholarly debate on what constitutes power have produced a consensual view of power as the capacity to produce intended effects, and in particular, the ability to influence the behavior of another person (Berger, 1994; Burgoon et al., 1998; Dunbar, 2004; French & Raven, 1959).”