When Due Process Is of No Consequence: Moral Mandates and Presumed Defendant Guilt or Innocence

By Linda J. Skitka, David A. Houston. 2001

149 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/989aa702190903610cdded77423b63ce5b0ee4ac

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Linda J. Skitka
2. Christopher W Bauman
3. Edward G. Sargis
4. Mayowa T. Babalola
5. J. Camps
6. J. Stouten
7. M. Euwema
8. S. Hutchinson

In Social Psychology

1. Linda J. Skitka
2. Christopher W Bauman
3. Edward G. Sargis
4. S. Hutchinson
5. J. Winquist
6. Mayowa T. Babalola
7. J. Stouten
8. J. Camps

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Linda J. Skitka
2. Christopher W Bauman
3. Edward G. Sargis
4. Mayowa T. Babalola
5. J. Stouten
6. M. Euwema
7. J. Camps
8. S. Hutchinson

Citations in the corpus

• Moral conviction: another contributor to attitude strength or something more? (2005, background): “For example, Skitka and Houston (2001) found that only those without a moral mandate about the need to punish a defendant perceived a defendants’ death to be more fair if it occurred as a consequence of due process (a trial and subsequent death penalty) than vigilantism (being killed by a vigilant”
• The Social and Political Implications of Moral Conviction (2014, background): “…hypothesis was also found in a longitudinal investigation of people’s reactions to the Elián González custody case and his return to Cuba (Skitka & Mullen, 2002a), in reaction to a range of hypothetical U.S. Supreme Court decisions (Skitka, 2002), and other contexts (e.g., Skitka & Houston, 2001).”
• Are Outcome Fairness and Outcome Favorability Distinguishable Psychological Constructs? A Meta-Analytic Review (2003, background): “For example, Skitka and her colleagues (Skitka, 2002; Skitka and Houston, 2001; Skitka and Mullen, 2002) have argued that when people have a clear a priori”
• The Psychology of Moral Conviction (2010, background): “The comparative fairness of the procedures only affected perceptions of outcome fairness in the ambiguous defendant guilt condition (Skitka & Houston, 2001).”
• When Do Ethical Leaders Become Less Effective? The Moderating Role of Perceived Leader Ethical Conviction on Employee Discretionary Reactions to Ethical Leadership (2019, background): “Indeed, when people have strong convictions about a particular issue, they are determined to approach things in line with only their own perspective (Mullen and Skitka 2006; Skitka and Houston 2001; Skitka and Mullen 2002).”