G. Stewart

Statistics and Probability · Nature · 2006–2021

A researcher in the Science corpus: 9 papers; trusts 10 researchers and is trusted by 38 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom G. Stewart trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Andrew Pullin
  2. W. J. Sutherland

Who trusts G. Stewart overall

  1. S. Cooke
  2. Mallika Sardeshpande
  3. D. Spear
  4. Dominique David-Chavez
  5. T. Kuuluvainen
  6. Nimmi Seoraj-Pillai
  7. Christoph F. J. Meyer
  8. A. Teeffelen
  9. Matthew Ashley
  10. Rebecca K. Smith

Papers from G. Stewart's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers G. Stewart trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations (British medical journal)
  2. PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts (PLoS Medicine)
  3. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. (Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA))
  4. Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review (Systematic Reviews)
  5. Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
  6. Missing inaction: the dangers of ignoring missing data. (Trends in Ecology & Evolution)
  7. The power of statistical tests for moderators in meta-analysis. (Psychological methods)
  8. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (British medical journal)
  9. The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations (Annals of Internal Medicine)
  10. PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews (Journal of the Medical Library Association)

Their papers