M. Lagisz

Statistics and Probability · 2015–2021

A researcher in the Science corpus: 4 papers; trusts 7 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom M. Lagisz trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Shinichi Nakagawa
  2. J. Hadfield
  3. David Moher
  4. Matthew J. Page
  5. Andrew Gelman
  6. J. Koricheva
  7. John P. A. Ioannidis
  8. J. Gurevitch
  9. Andrew Pullin
  10. Mourad Ouzzani

Papers from M. Lagisz's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers M. Lagisz trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Missing inaction: the dangers of ignoring missing data. (Trends in Ecology & Evolution)
  2. Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
  3. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations (British medical journal)
  4. Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review (Systematic Reviews)
  5. ROSES RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps (Environmental Evidence)
  6. The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations (Annals of Internal Medicine)
  7. Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (Nature)
  8. The power of statistical tests for moderators in meta-analysis. (Psychological methods)
  9. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (British medical journal)
  10. PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews (Journal of the Medical Library Association)

Their papers