Teaching Nature of Science to K‐2 Students: What understandings can they attain?
By V. Akerson, Lisa A. Donnelly. 2010
173 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/96e6d34510b791662f59988bab5de0e37a6071cf
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Lisa A. Donnelly
- D. Gillam
- Gayle A. Buck
- Ingrid S. Weiland
- Vanashri Nargund-Joshi
- J. Zhai
- Aik-Ling Tan
- J. Jocz
In Education
- Lisa A. Donnelly
- D. Gillam
- Gayle A. Buck
- Ingrid S. Weiland
- Vanashri Nargund-Joshi
- J. Zhai
- Aik-Ling Tan
- J. Jocz
Citations in the corpus
- The Importance of Teaching and Learning Nature of Science in the Early Childhood Years (2011, background): “This study (Akerson and Donnelly 2010) explored kindergarteners’, first-graders’, and second-graders’ NOS 538 J Sci Educ Technol (2011) 20:537–549”
- ‘Am I Like a Scientist?’: Primary children's images of doing science in school (2014, background): “Research has shown that students would not automatically learn about NOS merely through the engagement in inquiry-based activities (Moss, Abrams, & Robb, 2001).”
- A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas (2012, background): “Thus the picture of scientific reasoning is richer, more complex, and more diverse than the image of a linear and unitary scientific method would suggest [45].”