Scales for Rating the Behavioral Characteristics of Superior Students. Technical and Administration Manual. Revised Edition.

By Joseph S. Renzulli, L. H. Smith, A. J. White, Carolyn M. Callahan, R. K. Hartman, Karen L. Westberg. 2002

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9630c48ad248c0cc3185d4f6a9909fd97a8cfdad

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. M. Foley‐Nicpon
2. S. Peters
3. Marcia Gentry
4. N. Colangelo
5. S. Assouline
6. David Lubinski
7. Sally M. Reis
8. Jaret Hodges

Citations in the corpus

• Group-Specific Norms and Teacher-Rating Scales (2012, methodology): “Although originally designed using the Cognitive Abilities Test (CogAT; Lohman & Hagen, 2001) and the Scales for Rating the Behavioral Characteristics of Superior Students (SRBCSS; Renzulli et al., 2002), this process can be applied using different instruments.”
• Twice-Exceptional Learners (2013, methodology): “Examples of empirically supported teacher observations include the Scales for Rating the Behavioral Characteristics of Superior Students (Renzulli et al., 2010), the Scales for Identifying Gifted Students (Ryser & McConnell, 2004), and the Gifted Rating Scales (Pfeiffer & Jarosewich, 2003).”