Current paradigms in the international management field: an author co-citation analysis

By Francisco J. Acedo, José C. Casillas. 2005

255 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/96235a45cdfe002c74caa3774fe95bec8942471f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Entrepreneurship education and training as facilitators of regional development: A systematic literature review (2017, background): “Frequency of citations is an indicator of whether an article transmits important scientific knowledge that is then used as the basis for other research (Acedo and Casillas, 2005).”
A systematic literature review of the influence of the university’s environment and support system on the precursors of social entrepreneurial intention of students (2020, background): “It is also an indication that the scientific knowledge conveyed in these articles is the foundation of foreground knowledge of more recent articles (Acedo & Casillas, 2005; Casillas & Acedo, 2007; Liñán & Fayolle, 2015).”
The Concept of International Opportunity in International Entrepreneurship: A Review and a Research Agenda (2014, unknown): “Secondly, we crosschecked that listing with the ten most influential international management journals as ranked by Acedo and Casillas (2005) and the dedicated entrepreneurship journals as ranked by Katz and Boal (2002).”
Evolution of the Intellectual Structure of Family Business Literature: A Bibliometric Study of FBR (2007, unknown): “…& Gorden, 1993), organizational behavior (Culnan, O’Reilly, & Chatman, 1990), small enterprise (Ratnatunga & Romano, 1997), management information systems (Culnan, 1986), strategic management (Acedo, Barroso, & Galán, 2006; Ramos & Ruiz, 2004), and international management (Acedo & Casillas, 2005).”
Toward a taxonomy of career studies through bibliometric visualization (2014, methodology): “Within the field of management, novel mapping techniques have been used to visualize research in areas like international management (Acedo & Casillas, 2005), strategy (Ramos-Rodríguez & Ruíz-Navarro, 2004), and business ethics (Özmen Uysal, 2010).”
Theory of value co-creation: a systematic literature review (2014, methodology): “Following Acedo and Casillas (2005), an article was assigned to a research stream if it cited at least two of the core papers in that stream.”
Visualizing the structure and bridges of the intellectual property management and strategy literature: a document co-citation analysis (2014, unknown): “This is an important limitation to understand the real status of this research field, as it makes it difficult to compare the different proposals and, more importantly, it makes the description of what the field is and the prescription of what it should be to appear confused (Acedo and Casillas 2005”
Business and management in China: A review of empirical research in leading international journals (2007, methodology): “Acedo and Casillas (2005) considered it one of the ‘top five business journals’ based on a survey among members of the AIB and the International Management Division of the Academy of Management.”
Consumer Brand Relationships Research: A Bibliometric Citation Meta-Analysis (2015, unknown): “…been applied in the social science disciplines (Glanzel, 1996) such as international business (Fetscherin, Voss, & Gugler, 2010), international management (Acedo & Casillas, 2005), marketing (Arnott, 2007), advertising (Kim & McMillan, 2008) and communications (Pasadeos, Renfro, & Hanily, 1999).”
Toward a learning-based view of internationalization: The accelerated trajectories of cross-border learning for latecomers (2010, background): “This approach is especially critical for an interdisciplinary field with few shared roots, including international business (Acedo and Casillas, 2005; Buckley and Lessard, 2005) and general management (Agarwal and Hoetker, 2007; McGrath, 2007).”
Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization (2015, unknown): “Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), pp.”
A systematic literature review on entrepreneurial intentions: citation, thematic analyses, and research agenda (2015, background): “A regularly cited publication should be considered as conveying important scientific knowledge that is used as a foundation for further elaboration (Acedo and Casillas 2005; Casillas and Acedo 2007).”