Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization

6,174 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Big data and artificial intelligence in the maritime industry: a bibliometric review and future research directions (2020, background): “In cluster analysis, normalisation approaches compensate for different occurrence levels among items, and MDS also benefits from normalisation (Zupic and Tomaž 2015).”
A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis of Socially Responsible Funds (2019, methodology): “These techniques can be divided into four types of analyses: Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, co-authorship analysis, and co-word analysis [22].”
A Sustainable Tourism Policy Research Review (2019, background): “Literature co-citation is a measure of the similarity between articles, authors, or journals [11].”
Franchising research on emerging markets: Bibliometric and content analyses (2021, methodology): “Examples include systematic literature reviews, metaanalyses, bibliometric analyses, and content analyses (Apriliyanti & Alon, 2017; Gaur & Kumar, 2018; Maditati, Munim, Schramm, & Kummer, 2018; Zupic & Čater, 2015).”
Systematicity in Organizational Research Literature Reviews: A Framework and Assessment (2021, methodology): “…the evolutionary structure of literature can be facilitated using bibliometric techniques such as co-citation analysis and network analysis to identify different strands of theorizing based on citation patterns across different authors, theories, and subfields (see Zupic & Čater, 2015).”