Intergroup relations.
By D. Messick, D. Mackie. Annual Review of Psychology, 2019
1,350 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9454af5e37faa2f5aead2ddba8138f599dd76859
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- D. van Knippenberg
- Gerben A. van Kleef
- Adam M. Grant
- M. Hogg
- Astrid C. Homan
- John T. Jost
- Lindred L. Greer
- Nilanjana Dasgupta
Citations in the corpus
- Clearing the air: identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women's leadership aspirations. (2005, background): “…is critical to an individual's functioning in one context can become meaningless in the next context (Branscombe, Ellemers, Spears, & Doosje, 1999; Brewer & Brown, 1998; Maalouf , 2001; Steele, 2002; Steele et al., 2002; Tajfel & Turner, 1979, 1986; Turner, Hogg, Oakes, Reicher, & Wetherell,…”
- Cooperation, trust, and social capital in Southeast Asian urban slums (2004, background): “We expected that people from more homogeneous communities will be more cooperative with and more likely to punish other members of their " ingroup " (Messick and Mackie, 1989; Cardenas and Carpenter, 2002).”
- Managing Diversity by Creating Team Identity (2005, unknown): “Brewer and Brown (1998)argue that conferring status on a group legitimizes their superiority and makes them feel that they deserve, and thus should work to obtain, better outcomes for members of their group.7 In our experiments, we induce team identity using several different procedures.”
- The impact of international experience on cultural intelligence: an application of contact theory in a structured short-term programme (2014, background): “Brewer and Brown (1998) conclude from their review of the literature that the contract hypothesis developed by Allport (1954, 579 and 584) was ‘derived largely empirically, with experience with intergroup relations in real-world contexts’, and that ‘in the long run, cooperative contact seems to be…”
- Social identity patterns in culturally diverse organizations: The role of diversity climate (2012, unknown): “…categorize their fellow workgroup members in terms of their ethnic or cultural heritage (Elsass & Graves, 1997; O’Reilly, Williams, & Barsade, 1998), displaying a positive bias toward members who belong to the same cultural group and a negative bias toward those who do not (Brewer & Brown, 1998).”
- The Parasocial Contact Hypothesis (2005, background): “Because avoidance of members of specific groups is a form of negative social behavior that is consistent with negative attitudes (Brewer & Brown, 1998, p. 578), positive contact can create a sense of dissonance that can lead to attitude change.”
- Diversity faultlines, shared objectives, and top management team performance (2011, background): “People typically prefer working with similar (ingroup) others, trust similar others more, and are more willing to cooperate with similar others than with dissimilar (outgroup) others (Brewer and Brown, 1998; Tajfel and Turner, 1986).”
- On the malleability of automatic attitudes: combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals. (2001, background): “Despite the abundant research devoted to this topic, reviews of the literature reveal that attempts to reduce prejudice and discrimination have, at best, yielded mixed findings (Duckitt, 1992; Harding, Kutner, Proshansky, & Chein, 1954; Monteith, Zuwerink, & Devine, 1994; Stephan, 1985).”
- Subjective social status, work volition, and career adaptability: A longitudinal study (2017, background): “In addition to objective social class indices being poor predictors of factors such as prejudicial attitudes (Liu et al., 2004; Seeman, 1992), SES measures tend to be limited in capturing a full understanding of a person's social standing.”
- Language and Intergroup Contact: Investigating the Impact of Bilingual Instruction on Children’s Intergroup Attitudes (2005, background): “There is now a growing consensus in the literature that, at some point, group memberships must become salient for interactions between individual group members to affect intergroup attitudes (see also Brewer & Brown, 1998; Brown & Hewstone, 2005; Pettigrew, 1998; Rothbart & John, 1985).”