Managing Diversity by Creating Team Identity
By Catherine C. Eckel, Philip J. Grossman. 2005
459 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Safety Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/273636ed9a9687d55d627c6b75f3e43467481d9f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- David J. Cooper
- Rebecca Mitchell
- Avner Ben-Ner
- John H. Kagel
- Roy Chen
- Yan Chen
- Jeffrey P. Carpenter
- Asaf Zussman
In Management Science and Operations Research
- John H. Kagel
- Rebecca Mitchell
- Avner Ben-Ner
- Massoud Stephane
- Hua Wang
- Brian P. McCall
- David J. Cooper
- Jeffrey P. Carpenter
In Safety Research
- David J. Cooper
- Erick Gong
- John H. Kagel
- Avner Ben-Ner
- Massoud Stephane
- Hua Wang
- Brian P. McCall
- Jeffrey P. Carpenter
Citations in the corpus
- Individual Behavior and Group Membership (2007, unknown): “Eckel and Grossman (2005) vary group identity from none to weak (team identification only) to strong (team identification, prior team goal attainment, and conflict between the groups) in a repeated public-goods game.”
- Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: a meta-analysis. (2014, unknown): “…prisoner’s dilemma game (Goette, Huffman, Meier, & Sutter, 2012; Wit & Wilke, 1992; Yamagishi, Mifune, Liu, & Pauling, 2008), or (structurally equivalent) public goods dilemmas and resource dilemmas (Brewer & Kramer, 1986; De Cremer & Van Vugt, 1999; Eckel & Grossman, 2005; Kramer & Brewer, 1984).”
- Motivating Agents: How Much Does the Mission Matter? (2016, background): “In a chosen effort lab environment, Fehrler and Kosfeld (2012) find an increase in effort among mission-motivated workers only once firms can screen workers by offering less financially attractive contracts.”
- Culture and Institutions (2015, unknown): “trust toward group members versus out-group members—in which participants were divided into groups with trivially defined distinctions 25 —participants were willing to share more money or cooperate more with in-group members than with out-group members (Eckel and Grossman, 2005; Charness, Rigotti, a”
- Other Regarding Preferences: A Selective Survey of Experimental Results (2012, background): “Notable early examples where group identity enhances other-regarding behavior include Sell, Griffith, and Wilson (1993), Solow and Kirkwood (2002), Eckel and Grossman (2005), Charness, Rigotti and Rustichini (2007), and Croson, Marks, and Snyder (2008).”
- Judicial Ingroup Bias in the Shadow of Terrorism (2011, background): “Another prominent line of research looks at how the salience of group membership a¤ects contributions to public goods (e.g. Orbell, van de Kragt, and Dawes 1988; Bornstein 2003; Eckel and Grossman 2005).”
- When do interprofessional teams succeed? Investigating the moderating roles of team and professional identity in interprofessional effectiveness (2011, background): “In addition to ameliorating the negative impact of diversity, team identity is argued to enhance team collaborative behaviours and perception of shared goals (Eckel and Grossman, 2005).”
- Identity and in-group/out-group differentiation in work and giving behaviors: Experimental evidence (2009, background): “Employees that identify with their organization or team require fewer and different incentives to exercise high levels of effort than other employees (Akerlof and Kranton, 2005; Eckel and Grossman, 2005).”
- Social Identity and Inequality: The Impact of China's Hukou System (2015, unknown): “, 2006) and a growing number of experimental economics studies show that social identity has an impact on preferences and economic behavior (Eckel and Grossman, 2005; Goette et al., 2006; Charness et al., 2007; Chen and Li, 2009; Benjamin et al., 2010, 2013; Chen and Chen, 2011).”
- The Potential of Social Identity for Equilibrium Selection (2011, background): “by Roy Chen and Yan Chen Appendix”