The impact of international experience on cultural intelligence: an application of contact theory in a structured short-term programme

119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A systematic literature review on the definitions of global mindset and cultural intelligence – merging two different research streams (2017, background): “Cross-cultural training (e.g. Ramsey & Lorenz, 2016) and international experience (e.g. Engle & Crowne, 2014; Wood & St. Peters, 2014) can be used to foster cognitive components such as cross-cultural knowledge as well as motivational and behavioral aspects of cultural intelligence.”
Measuring cultural intelligence (CQ) (2015, unknown): “First, the samples used in most CQ studies tend to consist of respondents with little cross-cultural experience (e.g. Amiri et al., 2010; Ang and Van Dyne, 2008; Ang et al., 2006; Engle and Crowne, 2014; Gregory et al., 2009; Templer et al., 2006; Vedadi et al., 2010; Ward et al., 2009), which could”
Assessing Intercultural Competence in Higher Education: Existing Research and Future Directions (2016, result): “The results partially supported the hypothesis, as only two subscales (resilience and personal autonomy) were weakly correlated with the logarithm number of international job assignments (r = .20 and r = .29, respectively), and no subscales were correlated with the actual number of assignments. In a”