Team Polarity and Creative Performance in Innovation Teams

By Jan Kratzer, Roger Th. A. J. Leenders, J. V. Engelen. 2006

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Social Psychology, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/939309357352aa11f1dcc543eaa473a38695aec7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Jesús Salgado
2. Neil Anderson
3. Mary T. Dzindolet
4. D. van Knippenberg
5. H. Barkema
6. Paul B. Paulus
7. Ute R. Hülsheger
8. I. Hoever

In Social Psychology

1. D. van Knippenberg
2. Wendy P. van Ginkel
3. I. Hoever
4. Neil Anderson
5. Mary T. Dzindolet
6. Paul B. Paulus
7. H. Barkema
8. Ute R. Hülsheger

In Strategy and Management

1. Wendy P. van Ginkel
2. Neil Anderson
3. Mary T. Dzindolet
4. D. van Knippenberg
5. H. Barkema
6. Paul B. Paulus
7. I. Hoever
8. Thomas Hutzschenreuter

Citations in the corpus

• Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. (2009, background): “Some researchers have already started with this endeavor: It has been shown that intrateam disagreement affects innovation differently at different stages of the innovation process (Kratzer et al., 2006) and that the effect of task disagreement depends on the extent to which team members feel free t”
• Fostering team creativity: perspective taking as key to unlocking diversity's potential. (2010, background): “, 2009) and task characteristics (Kratzer et al., 2006) proposed by the CEM.”
• Social influence, creativity and innovation (2008, background): “Some research suggests task conflict may be curvilinearly related to creativity and innovation (De Dreu, 2006 ; Kratzer, Leenders, & van Engelen, 2006 ).”