Evaluating the metacognitive awareness inventory using empirical factor-structure evidence

160 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Metacognition in Psychology (2019, result): “Studies examining the scale’s factor structure have been inconsistent in both the choice of analyses and in the resulting conclusions (Harrison & Vallin, 2018).”
Evaluating metacognitive self-reports: systematic reviews of the value of self-report in metacognitive research (2020, background): “However, as Harrison and Vallin (2018) aptly point out, no theoretical explanation for three factors was provided, and they utilized only 21 of the original 52 items.”