Why and How Do State Governments Adopt and Implement “Managing for Results” Reforms?

By Donald P. Moynihan. 2004

142 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research, Public Administration

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/929ede6221950a8e58aecccb794dbfe88e3ab134

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

1. O. James
2. P. John
3. Jostein Askim

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. O. James
2. P. John
3. Jostein Askim

In Public Administration

1. O. James
2. P. John
3. Jostein Askim
4. Gregg G. Van Ryzin
5. Morten Hjortskov
6. Simon Calmar Andersen
7. Forrest V. Morgeson
8. A. Olsen

Citations in the corpus

• Public Management at the Ballot Box: Performance Information and Electoral Support for Incumbent English Local Governments (2006, background): “In the United States, the Government Performance and Results Act has mandated systems for Federal Government; systems have also been developed in most state and local governments (Melkers and Willoughby 1998; Moynihan 2005; Radin 1998).”
• How do politicians use performance information? An analysis of the Norwegian local government experience (2007, background): “This approach has been suggested as a promising avenue for performance management research by several scholars (Moynihan, 2005a; Pollitt, 2006a).”