Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review
By Fabiane Barreto Vavassori Benitti. Comput. Educ., 2012
1,087 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Science Applications
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/91deeee9d61cf47572018fb64ddbd944841934fa
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Science Applications
- Stavros N. Demetriadis
- Soumela Atmatzidou
- Pei-Wen Tzuo
- I-Ming Chen
- Albert J. Causo
- Song Huat Yeo
- Lai Poh Emily Toh
- Deborah A. Fields
Citations in the corpus
- Educational robotics: Open questions and new challenges (2013, background): “Studies in the field (e.g. Eguchi, 2010; Benitti, 2012) report that robotics have a potential impact on student’s learning in different subject areas (Physics, Mathematics, Engineering, Informatics and more) and on personal development including cognitive, meta-cognitive and social skills, such as: ”
- Advancing students' computational thinking skills through educational robotics: A study on age and gender relevant differences (2016, background): “It is also noted that more research is needed to point out how to work with educational robotics to help students develop specific skills [10,22].”
- A review of the applicability of robots in education (2013, neutral): “The only exceptions are [3] and [4].”
- What Is the State of theArt of Systematic Reviewin Engineering Education? (2015, background): “Benitti (2012) was exemplary in describing the searches of all six databases.”
- A Crafts-Oriented Approach to Computing in High School (2014, background): “At the K-12 level, robotics [Baretto and Benitti 2012], interface designs [Yardi et al. 2008], game design [Kafai 1995], and storytelling classes [Kelleher 2008] have been successful in broadening students’ participation in, and perceptions of, programming.”
- A Review on the Use of Robots in Education and Young Children (2016, methodology): “Benitti (2012) points out that more than 70 papers could have qualified in his review work but only 10 provided quantitative measurement on the use of robots in education.”
- Coding as a playground: Promoting positive learning experiences in childhood classrooms (2019, background): “The results showed that children achieved a high level of mastery of coding and computational thinking skills using robotics (Benitti, 2012).”