Future Time Perspective as a Predictor of School Investment

By T. Peetsma. 2000

169 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/91a7802451cb31b99f07eb38830f453aa4eaeed2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Laura Nota
2. F. Oort
3. T. Peetsma
4. Erik E. J. Thoonen
5. S. Soresi
6. Altay Eren
7. Kadir Vefa Tezel
8. I. van der Veen

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. I. van der Veen
2. Altay Eren
3. Kadir Vefa Tezel
4. F. Oort
5. S. Soresi
6. Laura Nota
7. Erik E. J. Thoonen
8. Peter J. C. Sleegers

Citations in the corpus

• Assessing the professional identity of primary student teachers: Design and validation of the Teacher Identity Measurement Scale (2020, background): “Nevertheless, there will undoubtedly be other domains worth investigating, such as resilience (Bobek, 2002) or future time perspective (Peetsma, 2000).”
• Time perspective and indecision in young and older adolescents (2010, background): “More recently, Peetsma ( 2000 ) found that students with higher levels of future time perspective work harder in school, more willingly do their homework and have better English grades than students with lower time perspective do.”
• Future time perspective as a motivational variable: Content and extension of future goals affect the quantity and quality of motivation (2012, background): “extrinsic goals) but also because one’s FTP may differ in different life domains, as shown in Herrera (Herrera, 2002, 2010; Lens, Herrera, & Lacante, 2004), Nuttin and Lens (1985), Peetsma (Peetsma, 2000; Peetsma & Van der Veen, 2011; Stouthard & Peetsma, 1999) and Seginer (2009).”
• Relations between adolescents’ self-evaluations, time perspectives, motivation for school and their achievement in different countries and at different ages (2005, background): “It seems somewhat subject-specific: the relation is stronger between investment in a subject and the achievement in that specific subject than for general measurements of investment and achievement (Peetsma, 2000).”
• Factors Influencing Teaching Choice, Professional Plans about Teaching, and Future Time Perspective: A Mediational Analysis. (2010, background): “, 2004), academic engagement (Horstmanshof & Zimitat, 2007), and professional expectations (Peetsma, 2000) are significantly related to FTP as seen in the following examples.”
• Can teachers motivate students to learn? (2011, background): “School investment, or just “investment”, refers to “concrete behavioural manifestations which reflect the underlying motivation and which can be predicted by using a ‘motivation’ concept” (Peetsma 2000, 177).”