Everyday Creativity in Daily Life: An Experience-sampling Study of “little c” Creativity

201 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Toward Untangling Creative Self-Beliefs (2017, methodology): “Ideally, researchers should use methods that blend more dynamic quantitative measurement (e.g., experience sampling methods; Silvia et al., 2014) with in-depth, process-immersive qualitative studies (Glăveanu, 2015) to better understand the dynamic nature of creative self-beliefs.”
Creative days: A daily diary study of emotion, personality, and everyday creativity. (2015, methodology): “Although we based this item on common definitions of creativity, and used a similar item in experience sampling research (Silvia et al., 2014), this measurement choice meant that participants themselves were the arbiters of creativity.”
Everyday creative activity as a path to flourishing (2018, methodology): “This item was developed based on common definitions of creativity (Hennessey & Amabile, 2010), and prior research used a similar question (Silvia et al., 2014) or this identical question (Conner & Silvia, 2015) (see the Discussion for limitations of this single item).”
Is creativity without intelligence possible? A Necessary Condition Analysis (2016, background): “Previous studies (Jauk et al., 2014) demonstrated that while intelligence indeed predicts creative achievement, it is personality (especially openness) that is associated with creative activity (Conner & Silvia, 2015; Silvia et al., 2014;Wolfradt&Pretz, 2001).”