Innovation as newness: what is new, how new, and new to whom?

By J. Johannessen, Bjørn Olsen, G. Lumpkin. 2001

817 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8c9d226c165226331cd23456e382f9b5259c3bc8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Innovative marketing in SMEs (2009, background): “Nature of innovation Within this context, innovation takes the form of either radical or incremental innovations, where radical innovations produce fundamental changes in the activities of an organisation and large departures from existing practices, whereas incremental innovations are an improvemen”
Types of innovation, sources of information and performance in entrepreneurial SMEs (2010, background): “But, as we occupy the filled-with-knowledge kind of world as we do, the question becomes: new to whom or new in what way (see, e.g. the discussion in Johannessen et al., 2001)?”
Determinants of radical product innovations (2006, background): “Therefore, will to learn and invest from scratch are variables that can explain the evolution of radical innovations (Johannessen et al., 2001).”
Disentangling the effects of organizational capabilities, innovation and firm size on SME sales growth (2013, neutral): “In strategy research, a commonly stated (and tested) assumption is that competitive advantage is gained through the introduction of novelty or newness, as customers are more willing to pay premium rents for unique products and services (Freel 2005; Freel and Robson 2004; Johannessen et al. 2001).”
Technology Clusters Versus Industry Clusters: Resources, Networks, and Regional Advantages (2006, background): “Weak ties provide more diverse and richer links to the kinds of novel and unique information that may be needed to generate innovative activity (Granovetter 1973; Johannessen, Olsen, and Lumpkin 2001; O’Donnell et al. 2001).”
Does innovation lead to performance? An empirical study of SMEs in Taiwan (2007, background): “…be directed at new products or services, new organizational structures or administrative systems, new process technologies or new programs pertaining to organizational members for these typically occur simultaneously (Drejer, 2002; Garcia and Calantone, 2002; Johannessen et al., 2001; Trott, 1998).”
Effects of Innovation Types on Firm Performance (2011, neutral): “…nonetheless innovative activities need to be focused on many aspects simultaneously such as new products, new organizational and marketing practices or administrative systems, and new process technologies (Drejer, 2002; Garcia and Calantone, 2002; Johannessen et al., 2001; Lin and Chen, 2007).”
Government regulation as an impetus for innovation: Evidence from energy performance regulation in the Dutch residential building sector (2007, background): “The term ‘radical’ has been associated with revolutionary innovations, whereas ‘incremental’ is associated with innovations within a paradigm (Johannessen et al., 2001).”
Incremental Innovation and Business Performance: Small and Medium‐Size Food Enterprises in a Concentrated Industry Environment (2006, background): “Increasingly, researchers ( Johannessen, Olsen, and Lumpkin 2001; Damanpour 1996; McGrath et al. 1996) have started to discuss innovation from a much wider perspective than in earlier studies.”
Open innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises: An overview (2013, background): “It is widely acknowledged that SMEs must embrace innovation in a wider definitional context, and develop their collaborative innovation capabilities beyond that of technical innovation based solely on R&D (Johannessen et al., 2001).”