Students' Perceptions of Expressiveness: Age and Gender Effects on Teacher Evaluations

By J. Arbuckle, Benne D. Williams. 2003

159 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/88d367f65df78e675a9d359289b7f47f1a8ac4ba

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Scaling Down Inequality: Rating Scales, Gender Bias, and the Architecture of Evaluation (2019, background): “…and growing body of work shows that teaching evaluations also contribute to gender inequalities within the profession (Abel and Meltzer 2007; Arbuckle and Williams 2003; Baldwin and Blattner 2003; Boring et al. 2016; MacNell et al. 2015; McPherson et al. 2009; Mengel et al. 2017; Sidanius…”
Gender biases in student evaluations of teaching (2017, result): “These double standards are consistent with findings from studies conducted in experimental settings, in which the researchers were able to control for teaching styles (Arbuckle and Williams, 2003, and MacNell et al., 2014).1 The fact that gender stereotypes may be driving students’ ratings is consis”
Student Views of Effective Online Teaching in Higher Education (2006, background): “…of instructor personality on student ratings (Murray, Rushton, and Paunonen 1990), the effects of student characteristics on student ratings (Arbuckle and Williams 2003; Centra and Gaubatz 2000), the relation between student ratings and student achievement (Co-hen 1981; Greenwald and…”
The role of perceived race and gender in the evaluation of college teaching on RateMyProfessors.Com. (2010, background): “Although some prior studies investigated faculty characteristics such as age (Arbuckle & Williams, 2003) and sexual orientation (Liddle, 1997), the most researched demographic characteristic in relation to SETs is gender (Heckert, Latier, Ringwald, & Silvey, 2006).”
Student Evaluations of Teaching (Mostly) Do Not Measure Teaching Effectiveness (2016, methodology): “Age, [11], charisma [13], and physical attractiveness [14,15] are also associated with SET.”
The L2 motivational self system: A meta-analysis (2018, background): “When it comes to experimental research, a number of educational studies conducted in different parts of the world – including Italy (Braga, Paccagnella, & Pellizzari, 2014), France (Boring, 2015), and the United States (Arbuckle & Williams, 2003; Carrell & West, 2010; MacNell, Driscoll, & Hunt, 2015”
How do we rate? An evaluation of online student evaluations (2009, background): “2003 ), older instructors (Arbuckle and Williams 2003 ), less experienced instructors (Fries and McNinch 2003 ), instructors anticipated to issue lower grades (Sinclair and Kunda 2000 ), instructors whom students perceive to hold different values and politics from their own (Kemmelmeier et al .”
The effects of lecturer commitment on student perceptions of teaching quality and student satisfaction in Chinese higher education (2015, unknown): “Other studies have found that student perceptions can easily be biased, for example against less experienced lecturers (Fries & McNinch, 2003), older lecturers (Arbuckle & Williams, 2003), and homosexual lecturers (Ewing, Stukas, & Sheehan, 2003).”