Responding Responsibly to the Frenzy To Assess Learning in Higher Education.
By R. Shavelson, Leta Huang. 2003
111 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/87086e344c4af032729f14c7571bb0406ace9b9b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- George D. Kuh
- S. Klein
- Rachelle L. Brooks
- Ansgar Opitz
- Marc Chun
- L. Hamilton
- Moritz Heene
- Frank Fischer
Citations in the corpus
- Measuring University Quality (2005, background): “External accountability demands are increasing in intensity for institutions, as are demands for greater public “transparency” of assessment results (Allen & Bresciani, 2003; Schneider, 2002; Shavelson & Huang, 2003).”
- Measuring scientific reasoning – a review of test instruments (2017, background): “…at least some authors see quantitative reasoning as a relevant aspect of scientific reasoning itself, instead of being an overarching competence (Shavelson & Huang, 2003), so in the future there should be a discussion within the field if and in which way quantitative reasoning should be part of…”
- Assessment of Learning Outcomes in Higher Education: A Comparative Review of Selected Practices. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 15. (2008, unknown): “They involve an understanding of how, why, and when certain knowledge applies (Shavelson and Huang, 2003).”
- An Approach to Measuring Cognitive Outcomes Across Higher Education Institutions (2005, methodology): “We follow this with a review of the conceptual framework Shavelson and Huang (2003) suggested for defining and building direct measures of student learning.”