An Approach to Measuring Cognitive Outcomes Across Higher Education Institutions

By S. Klein, George D. Kuh, Marc Chun, L. Hamilton, R. Shavelson. 2005

138 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Over the past decade, state legislatures have experienced increasing pressure to hold higher education accountable for student learning. This pressure stems from several sources, such as increasing costs and decreasing graduation rates. To explore the feasibility of one approach to measuring student learning that emphasizes program improvement, we administered several open-ended tests to 1365 students from 14 diverse colleges. The strong correspondence between hand and computer assigned scores indicates the tests can be administered and graded cost effectively on a large scale. The scores were highly reliable, especially when the college is the unit of analysis; they were sensitive to years in college; and they correlated highly with college GPAs. We also found evidence of “value added” in that scores were significantly higher at some schools than at others after controlling on the school’s mean SAT score. Finally, the students said the tasks were interesting and engaging.

Subfields: Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4d2f6b00a21e26c6cca3bc3a699a16f91de8f56f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

  1. George D. Kuh
  2. John C. Beachboard
  3. Wenling Li
  4. Martine Robinson Beachboard
  5. Stephen Adkison
  6. R. Carini
  7. Nicholas A. Bowman
  8. Stephen R. Porter

Citations in the corpus