Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning
By F. Coffield, David Moseley, Elaine Hall, K. Ecclestone. 2004
501 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/85fdcf5edf2d0727561f36a41c483f46edf146dc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- Skills, learning styles and success of first-year undergraduates (2007, background): “An excellent summary of learning styles is given in Coffield et al. (2004).”
- Visual, Auditory, Kinaesthetic Learning Styles and Their Impacts on English Language Teaching (2011, background): “Of course, we may not know every detail; however, being aware of our students’ learning styles, psychological qualities and motivational differences will help us regulate our lessons appropriately and according to the conditions (Mc Carthy, 1982; Felder, Silverman, 1988; Coffield et al., 2004).”
- Learning Styles (2008, unknown): “For example, in a relatively comprehensive review, Coffield et al. (2004) described 71 different schemes, and they did not claim that their list was exhaustive.”
- Cultural Determinants of Learning Style Preferences (2010, background): “…to bear in mind that there exists a wide range of alternative learning style frameworks (for a detailed review of the most important concepts, see Coffield et al., 2004), that differ, for example, in the extent to which they take into account the emotional or biological underpinnings of learning…”