The relationship between rater affect and three sources of 360-degree feedback ratings

By David Antonioni, Heejoon Park. 2001

101 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/855b54ab8015c9504bffa876da516113cf488693

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Accountability in a Performance Appraisal Context: The Effect of Audience and Form of Accounting on Rater Response and Behavior (2007, methodology): “For example, previous research suggests that raters are prone to inflate ratings for those they have affect-based or long-term connections with (e.g., Antonioni & Park, 2001; Longnecker et al., 1987; Park, Sims, & Motowidlo, 1986).”
Are you really doing good things in your boss's eyes? Interactive effects of employee innovative work behavior and leader–member exchange on supervisory performance ratings (2018, background): “…to them (e.g., regarding personality, age, or gender; Tsui & O'Reilly, 1989; Varma & Stroh, 2001), when supervisors have positive sentiments toward the employee (Antonioni & Park, 2001; Cardy & Dobbins, 1986; Levy & Williams, 2004), or when the spatial distance between Note: N = 143 subordinates.”
Employees' Perception of Performance Appraisal System: A Case Study (2012, background): “Antonioni and Park (2001) found that affect was more strongly related to rating leniency in upward and peer ratings than it was in traditional top-down ratings.”
The Social Context of Performance Appraisal: A Review and Framework for the Future (2004, background): “…Hansen, Erofeev & Gudanowski, 2001; Conway & Huffcutt, 1997; Facteau & Craig, 2001; Warr & Bourne, 1999), rater and ratee effects on ratings (Antonioni & Park, 2001; Brutus, Fleenor & McCauley, 1999; Fletcher & Baldry, 2000; Warech & Smither, 1998; Warr & Bourne, 1999) and the application…”
Control in a Teamwork Environment—The Impact of Social Ties on the Effectiveness of Mutual Monitoring Contracts (2003, background): “However, there has been a reluctance to report these evaluations upwardly or to tie compensation to them (Antonioni and Park 2001; Jackson and Greller 1998; Thatcher 1996; Wells 1999).8 In fact, several authorities (e.g., W. Edwards Deming, Peter Drucker, and Tom Peters) warn expressly against…”
The effects of job characteristics and working conditions on job performance (2007, background): “…such as age, gender (Lee and Alvares, 1977), experience (Schmidt et al., 1986), observation time (Moser et al., 1999), interpersonal affect (Antonioni and Park, 2001), rating format (Yun et al., 2005), workplace deviant behaviors (Dunlop and Lee, 2004), and organizational politics (Witt et…”
Measuring and promoting inter-rater agreement of teacher and principal performance ratings. (2012, background): “Additionally, people who work together may develop friendships or animosities, which studies have shown to bias observers (Antonioni & Park, 2001; Kwan, 2009; Robbins & DeNisi, 1994).”