Creative Thinking Ability: Domain Generality and Specificity

By E. Hong, R. Milgram. 2010

139 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2da57a449e904ec33308ecbe5bd9bef3f4c3c63d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. S. Bas
2. Ayhan Kursat Erbas
3. Chia-Yi Lin
4. Seok-hee Cho
5. S. Chamberlin
6. E. Mann

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Chia-Yi Lin
2. Seok-hee Cho
3. S. Bas
4. Ayhan Kursat Erbas
5. S. Chamberlin
6. Joseph S. Kozlowski
7. E. Mann
8. R. Leikin

Citations in the corpus

• The Contribution of Personality Traits, Motivation, Academic Risk-Taking and Metacognition to the Creative Ability in Mathematics (2015, background): “Indeed, Hong and Milgram (2010) showed that domain-general and domain-specific creative thinking abilities are related and yet distinguishable.”
• Predicting Creative Problem-Solving in Math From a Dynamic System Model of Creative Problem Solving Ability (2011, methodology): “Hong and Milgram (2010) referred that the creative thinking is hard to define but usually be measured by DT test.”
• Factors that Influence Mathematical Creativity (2019, background): “Hong and Milgram (2010) investigated the relationship between domain-specific and domain-general creative thinking to evaluate whether educational experiences could influence creativity.”