Studying Knowledge Management in Information Systems Resarch: Discourses and Theoretical Assumptions

By Ulrike Schultze, Dorothy Elliott Leidner. MIS Q., 2002

683 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Communication, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8288fe5da9ce28e8e8e1e6b6835ef9da94e3536c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Communication

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Vicious and Virtuous Circles in the Management of Knowledge: The Case of Infosys Technologies (2005, background): “Others have written about "knowledge management as a (double edged sword" (Schultze and Leidner 2002), the "deadliest sins cf knowledge management" (Fahey and Prusak 1998) and "knowledge traps" (Soo et al.”
Examining the impacts of organizational culture and top management support of knowledge sharing on the success of software process improvement (2016, methodology): “As SPI is a highly knowledge-intensive activity (Dyba, 2005; Mathiassen & Pourkomeylian, 2003), the theory of knowledge management (Alavi, Kayworth, & Leidner, 2005; Alavi & Leidner, 2001; Baskerville & Dulipovici, 2006; Schultze & Leidner, 2002) is used as the theoretical base of this study.”
Team Knowledge and Coordination in Geographically Distributed Software Development (2007, background): “understanding how team knowledge affects coordination in teams can help us identify effective system solutions to knowledge management, which can foster larger knowledge structures, greater knowledge sharing, more effective member interconnection, easier access to knowledge sources in the team, and ”
Membership Turnover and Collaboration Success in Online Communities: Explaining Rises (2011, background): “Groups that are isolated from outside perspectives can develop biases and insular thinking that leave them susceptible to overconfidence about the group’s ability to collaborate effectively (Janis 1972; Schultze and Leidner 2002).”
Knowledge management in software engineering: A systematic review of studied concepts, findings and research methods used (2008, background): “Schultze and Leidner [103] studied discourses of knowledge management in information systems research, and warn that knowledge can be a double-edged sword: too little can result in expensive mistakes, while too much can lead to unwanted accountability.”
Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Empirical Investigation (2005, background): “Concurrent with the organizational interest in KM, a large number of academic papers have been published on KM (Schultze and Leidner 2002).”
Knowledge management enablers: a case study (2006, neutral): “Additionally, many scholars when focusing their researches on the key factors for the success of knowledge management have not just found the importance of organizational knowledge contribution and sharing, they have also discovered that incentive program plays a major role in the activity of knowle”
The Dynamic Structure of Management Support Systems: Theory Development, Research Focus, and Direction (2007, methodology): “These include knowledge management systems (KMS) and business intelligence (BI) (Alavi and Leidner 2001; Anderson-Lehman et al. 2004, Lee and Choi 2003; Rouibah and Ould-ali 2002; Schultze and Leidner 2002).”
The theoretical foundations of knowledge management (2006, background): “These frameworks also look at the underlying structure of this research including knowledge as a process, knowledge sharing as a transaction, and the schools of knowledge management that regard these research structures (e.g., Earl, 2001; Grover & Davenport, 2001; Schultze & Leidner, 2002).”
On being ‘systematic’ in literature reviews in IS (2015, background): “Depending on their purpose literature reviews can be very different in their structure and presentation: it may build upon an existing classification framework (Schultze and Leidner, 2002), focus on an analysis of researched variables (Lacity et al.”