Some are punished and some are rewarded: A study of the impact of performance pay on job satisfaction

169 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The relationship between extrinsic motivation, job satisfaction and life satisfaction amongst employees in a public organisation (2014, result): “But be that as it may, the findings of the present study seem to contradict the established relationship between promotion and job satisfaction from previous studies (McCausland et al., 2005; Saari & Judge, 2004; Shields & Ward, 2001).”
Human resource management practices and workers' job satisfaction (2008, background): “A wider literature exists on the effects of introducing new pay practices in companies (see, e.g. Black and Lynch, 2004; Booth and Frank, 1999; Cappelli and Neumark, 1999; McCausland et al., 2005; Lazear, 2000).”
The Impact of Pay and Promotion on Job Satisfaction: Evidence from Higher Education Institutes of Pakistan (2012, background): “” Another definition of promotion is “the reassignment of an employee to a higher-rank of job[19]”.”
Fringe benefits and job satisfaction (2010, methodology): “McCausland et al. (2005) use instruments to control for worker selection into”
Performance Pay, Risk Attitudes and Job Satisfaction (2008, unknown): “McCausland et al. (2005) use data from the British Household Panel Study (BHPS) showing that the influence of performance pay tends to increase satisfaction for the more highly paid but reduce it for the less highly paid.”