Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited.
By A. Bandura, Edwin A. Locke. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003
2,912 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7f79435acb134ec9d0807fdb172913eb7eb40815
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- Fred Luthans
- James Avey
- Bruce J. Avolio
- Carolyn M. Youssef
- Robert A. Baron
- Fred Walumbwa
- Steven M. Norman
- Keith M. Hmieleski
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Fred Luthans
- Bruce J. Avolio
- Fred Walumbwa
- James Avey
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Robert A. Baron
- Keith M. Hmieleski
- S. Hannah
In Social Psychology
- Fred Luthans
- Bruce J. Avolio
- James Avey
- Fred Walumbwa
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Carolyn M. Youssef
- S. Hannah
- Usman Raja
Citations in the corpus
- Self-Efficacy and Political Skill as Comparative Predictors of Task and Contextual Performance: A Two-Study Constructive Replication (2008, background): “As such, self-efficacy reflects more than merely an ability estimate, but in addition, includes a motivational component, or a willingness to expend effort consistent with ability (eg, Bandura & Locke, 2003 ).”
- Self‐regulation and decision heuristics in entrepreneurial opportunity evaluation and exploitation (2007, background): “In addition, those with high perceived self-efficacy focus on the pursuit of opportunities and risk seeking, whereas the less self-efficacious dwell on the avoidance of mistakes and risk avoidance (Bandura and Locke, 2003).”
- Entrepreneurial Motivations: What Do We Still Need to Know? (2011, background): “The motivational concept of “mastery” has a great deal in common with the concept of self-efficacy, which is a key antecedent of entrepreneurial intentions (Bandura and Locke 2003; Krueger, Reilly, and Carsrud 2000; Wong, Lee, and Leung 2006; Zhao, Seibert, and Hills 2005).”
- Contextual Factors Related to Math Anxiety in Second-Grade Children (2014, background): “The central belief that one has the power to produce desired outcomes contributes to the person’s incentive to act or to persevere in the face of difficulties (Bandura & Locke, 2003).”
- Behavioral Approaches to Classroom Management (2013, background): “…over the past several decades, becoming much more attuned to the contextual aspects of specific behaviors and incorporating much more of what has come to be called social learning theory (see Bandura, 1977, 1986; Bandura & Locke, 2003; Caprara, Barbarnelli, Pastorelli, Bandura, & Zimbardo, 2000).”
- How work–family enrichment influence innovative work behavior: Role of psychological capital and supervisory support (2017, background): “Bandura and Locke (2003) have indicated that confidence in one’s self-efficacy helps to cope with distressing and self-debilitating emotional states that may act as obstructions in achieving the goal.”
- Selection for international assignments (2009, background): “On the other hand, the social cognitive theorists (e.g., Bandura & Locke, 2003; Bandura, 1977a,b) contend that prior foreign experience with the host culture is positively related to adjustment provided that the experience does not serve to reinforce previously held stereotypical beliefs or foster…”
- Finding a Between-Person Negative Effect of Self-Efficacy on Performance: Not Just a Within-Person Effect Anymore (2014, background): “Bandura (2012; Bandura & Locke, 2003) argued that the control theory perspective suggested self-efficacy was self-debilitating.”
- A multilevel study of leadership, empowerment, and performance in teams. (2007, background): “In addition, there are ample longitudinal and experimental studies supporting the causal influence of self-efficacy (captured by the competence dimension of empowerment) on performance (see Bandura & Locke, 2003).”