Managing criticism in Ph.D. supervision: a qualitative case study
By Sarah Li, C. Seale. 2007
127 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, General Health Professions
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7ea3fd7f040cdd2878a149edeea988814eb50794
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Martin East
- M. Mainhard
- Helen Basturkmen
- J. Bitchener
- Albert Pilot
- Andrew E. Walker
- Gulfidan Can
- Mieke Brekelmans
In General Health Professions
Citations in the corpus
- A Model for Doctoral Students’ Perceptions and Attitudes Toward Written Feedback for Academic Writing (2011, background): “The source of the feedback tends to be supervisors (Kumar and Stracke 2007; Li and Seale 2007), other faculty (Eyres et al.”
- Master's thesis supervision: relations between perceptions of the supervisor–student relationship, final grade, perceived supervisor contribution to learning and student satisfaction (2012, background): “In the context of research supervision, several studies describe the difficult task for supervisors of creating a delicate balance between the need to guide and structure the student work on the one hand, and to preserve the student's autonomy on the other hand (Delamont, Parry, and Atkinson 1998 ;”
- Supervisors' on-script feedback comments on drafts of dissertations: socialising students into the academic discourse community (2014, background): “It has been described as ‘a symbiotic and cordial relationship . . .collaboratively developed and sustained’ in which the ability to manage constructive criticism is essential (Li and Seale 2007, 511).”
- A model for the supervisor–doctoral student relationship (2009, unknown): “Importantly he concludes from analyses of PhD students’ views on supervision that, although the frequency of meetings between supervisor and candidate is essential, the quality of these meetings is even more (cf. Li and Seale 2007).”
- A sociocultural view of doctoral students' relationships and agency (2010, background): “Others have shown how doctoral candidates may find ways to accommodate supervisory difficulties or limitations, learn to do without, seek help from others, or teach themselves (Acker, Hill and Black 1994 ; Hopwood and Sutherland 2009 ; Lee and Williams 1999 ; Li and Seale 2007 ).”