A model of dual attitudes.

By Timothy D. Wilson, S. Lindsey, T. Y. Schooler. Psychology Review, 2000

2,249 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7e9cd7f47b2e6209ed22e8b38b533ec567876e2a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Changing explicit and implicit attitudes: The case of self-esteem (2009, background): “Although we can not plead for one particular dual-process model to be the best in integrating our findings we can clearly articulate that our findings are not compatible with the assumptions of Wilson et al. (2000), who postulate that implicit attitudes are hardly changeable.”
Do You Really Know What You Believe? Developing the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) as a Direct Measure of Implicit Beliefs (2006, background): “Subsequent and more complex relational responding may fail to cohere with the first private response, but when the behavioural system is put under pressure, as with the IRAP, the impact of the first or most probable response is difficult to hide (cf. Wilson, et al., 2000 ).”
Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes (2007, neutral): “Theoretical and methodological innovation has spurred interest in implicit social cognition (Greenwald & Banaji, 1995; Wilson et al., 2000 ).”
Egocentrism and focalism in unrealistic optimism (and pessimism) (2004, background): “We are reminded of the distinction in a number of literatures between implicit and explicit processes that occasionally diverge, yet nevertheless independently predict important behavioral and judgmental outcomes (e.g., Dovidio, Kawakami, Johnson, Johnson, & Howard, 1997; Wilson, Lindsey, & Schoole”
Sticky Priors: The Perseverance of Identity Effects on Judgment (2004, background): “Identities duel only when they lead to conflicting judgments (Wilson, Lindsey, and Schooler 2000).”
The Associative–Propositional Evaluation Model: Theory, Evidence, and Open Questions (2011, methodology): “A common assumption in the attitude literature is that implicit evaluations are the product of highly robust representations that have their roots in longterm socialization experiences (e.g., Rudman, 2004; Wilson et al., 2000).”
The associations in our heads belong to us: Searching for attitudes and knowledge in implicit evaluation (2008, background): “Alternate views of distinguishing person and culture Theoretical conceptions of implicit attitudes suggest that they are introspectively inaccessible reflections of previous experience (Banaji, 2001; Greenwald & Banaji, 1995; Wilson et al., 2000).”
TARGET ARTICLE: Attributions of Implicit Prejudice, or "Would Jesse Jackson 'Fail' the Implicit Association Test?" (2004, neutral): “For example, Wittenbrink et al. (2001) and Barden, Maddux, Petty, and Brewer (2004) have separately shown the impact on IAT or affective priming results of the context in which the African-American individual appeared. In the first experiment of Wittenbrink et al. (2001), all participants were first”
Implicit measures in social cognition. research: their meaning and use. (2003, background): “(e.g., Wilson et al. 2000, Schwarz & Bohner 2001).”