Do You Really Know What You Believe? Developing the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) as a Direct Measure of Implicit Beliefs

By D. Barnes-Holmes, Yvonne Barnes-Holmes, E. Hayden, R. Milne, Ian Stewart. 2006

327 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5a62bd895b2ebf0eeeb11b70a31a3b386ef7061b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The Dominance of Associative Theorizing in Implicit Attitude Research: Propositional and Behavioral Alternatives (2011, methodology): “A new methodology has recently been advanced in this respect, termed the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP; Barnes-Holmes et al., 2006).”
A First Test of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure as a Measure of Self-Esteem: Irish Prisoner Groups and University Students (2009, methodology): “Critically, the REP provided the basis for the development of the IRAP, which is basically a combination of the IAT and the REP (see Barnes-Holmes et al., 2006; BarnesHolmes, Hayden, Barnes-Holmes, & Stewart, 2008).”
The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP ) and the Malleability of Ageist Attitudes (2009, background): “Experiment 2 then sought to investigate the malleability 2 We assume that responding against incipient relational responses may occur at an unconscious or nondeliberative level (Barnes-Holmes et al., 2006).”
The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure: Exploring the Impact of Private Versus Public Contexts and the Response Latency Criterion on Pro-White and Anti-Black Stereotyping Among White Irish Individuals (2010, result): “…latency appears to increase implicit stereotyping is consistent with a behavior-analytic and RFT account that has been offered for the IRAP effect (Barnes-Holmes et al., 2006), which we now refer to as the relational elaboration and coherence (REC) model (Barnes-Holmes, Barnes-Holmes, Stewart, &…”
The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (Irap) As a Response-Time and Event-Related-Potentials Methodology for Testing Natural Verbal Relations: A Preliminary Study (2008, unknown): “The current data supported this prediction, and thus it seems important to suggest a tentative process-based explanation for the IRAP effect (see Barnes-Holmes et al., 2006).”
Testing the Fake-ability of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP): The First Study (2007, unknown): “Recent empirical evidence has supported this prediction (Barnes-Holmes et al, 2006).”
Holding on to our functional roots when exploring new intellectual islands: A voyage through implicit cognition research (2012, background): “…Judd, & Park, 1997), the Implicit Association Test (IAT; Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998) and the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP; Barnes-Holmes et al., 2006; for an overview of these tasks see Nosek et al., 2011; Gawronski & De Houwer, in press).1 An extensive literature now…”