The Associative–Propositional Evaluation Model: Theory, Evidence, and Open Questions

By Bertram Gawronski, Galen Bodenhausen. 2011

390 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/51e50973b219cd225510153c3633a299ef19b2d9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Holding on to our functional roots when exploring new intellectual islands: A voyage through implicit cognition research (2012, background): “For others, behavior is rooted in two conceptually distinct kinds of processes (i.e., associative linking vs. propositional reasoning) that operate under different subcomponents of automaticity (Gawronski & Bodenhausen, 2011).”
Social Categorization and the Perception of Social Groups (2012, background): “However, as Gawronski and Bodenhausen (2006, 2011) point out, it is certainly also possible that additional deliberation can simply serve to reinforce initial association-based impressions; this is particularly likely to happen in circumstances where there are motivational forces leading the…”
Women's Representation in Science Predicts National Gender-Science Stereotypes: Evidence from 66 Nations. (2015, methodology): “This result suggests that repeated and varied exposures to counterstereotypic women may be necessary to stably change implicit gender-science stereotypes, consistent with broader literature on implicit social cognition (Gawronski & Bodenhausen, 2006, 2011).”
Price Promotion for Emotional Impact (2014, background): “…social psychology and some areas of marketing research that people make decisions by integrating two qualitatively distinct types of thinking: one, automatic and affect laden; the other, controlled and deliberate (Epstein 1994; Gawronski and Bodenhausen 2011; Shiv and Fedorikhin 1999; Zajonc 1980).”
baCk To The fUTUre of DissonanCe Theory: CogniTive ConsisTenCy as a Core moTive (2012, positive): “…may serve as a basis for a negative propositional evaluation of the target group, unless a negative evaluation is inconsistent with other prejudice-relevant beliefs (see Gawronski & Bodenhausen, 2006, 2011), including perceptions of discrimination and egalitarianism-related, nonprejudicial goals.”
Bidirectional associations between descriptive and injunctive norms (2015, background): “It is well-established that automatic associations can come about through classical conditioning, that is, repeated co-occurrence of stimuli (Gawronski & Bodenhausen, 2011; Olson & Fazio, 2001).”
To judge a book by its weight you need to know its content: Knowledge moderates the use of embodied cues (2012, background): “Hence, participants may rely on weight as a general signal of importance when other variables — from time pressure to distraction and lack of motivation — impair a more systematic evaluation of the hypothesis (for related discussions see Gawronski & Bodenhausen, 2011; Petty & Cacioppo, 1986).”
A functional-cognitive framework for attitude research (2013, background): “Moreover, it allows one to take seriously the idea that EC effects may be due to several mental processes, including processes that do not involve the automatic formation of associative links (De Houwer, 2007; Gawronski & Bodenhausen, 2011).”
Implicit and Explicit Evaluation: A Brief Review of the Associative-Propositional Evaluation Model (2014, background): “The main goal of the current article is to provide a brief review of the associative– propositional evaluation (APE) model, which explains dissociations between implicit and explicit evaluations in terms of two functionally distinct mental processes (Gawronski & Bodenhausen, 2006, 2007, 2011).”
Dual Process Th eories (2013, methodology): “A more recent example is the associativepropositional evaluation (APE) model (Gawronski & Bodenhausen, 2006, 2011), which identifies factors leading to changes in evaluations captured by implicit measures, changes in evaluations captured by explicit measures, and changes in both.”
Two minds, three ways: dual system and dual process models in consumer psychology (2012, background): “Comparing duality models and dual structure attitudes, previous research has suggested the existence of a relationship between implicit vs. explicit attitudes and corresponding associative (S1) vs. propositional (S2) processes (Gawronski and Bodenhausen 2006, 2011).”
Consciousness, Implicit Attitudes and Moral Responsibility (2014, neutral): “The important point is that though implicit attitudes may have quite broad contents, these contents are bound together associatively rather than propositionally (Gawronski & Bodenhausen 2011).”
Dose-Dependent Media Priming Effects of Stereotypic Newspaper Articles on Implicit and Explicit Stereotypes (2013, methodology): “In contrast, we assume that individuals have experiential access to automatically activated stereotypes (see Gawronski & Bodenhausen, 2011).”