The associations in our heads belong to us: Searching for attitudes and knowledge in implicit evaluation

By Brian A. Nosek, J. Hansen. 2008

172 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/415ed914e3577a4e07878fbb7c3806cd91ebe583

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The marketplace of ideology: “Elective affinities” in political psychology and their implications for consumer behavior (2017, background): “The evidence, whether based on surveys of university students (Carney et al., 2008), internet users (Nosek & Hansen, 2008), or nationally representative samples (Gerber, Huber, Doherty, Dowling, & Ha, 2010) is exceedingly clear.”
Implicit Race Attitudes Predicted Vote in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election (2009, result): “The present finding of successful prediction of individual behavior by an IAT measure undermines any dismissal of the IAT as measuring cultural knowledge that plays no role in determining individual behavior (a conclusion also strongly supported by Nosek & Hansen, 2008).”
Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes (2007, background): “If so, it is not clear whether that cultural knowledge is (a) extrapersonal, in the sense that it is attitude irrelevant and not predictive of individual perception, judgement, or action, or (b) personal, and part of what distinguishes implicit from explicit attitudes (Banaji, 2001; Nosek & Hansen,”
Holding on to our functional roots when exploring new intellectual islands: A voyage through implicit cognition research (2012, background): “…(Parling, Cernvall, Stewart, Barnes-Holmes, & Ghaderi, 2012), self-esteem in a prisoner population (Vahey, Barnes-Holmes, Barnes-Holmes, & Stewart, 2009) as well as emotional responding for high versus low depressed individuals (Hussey & Barnes-Holmes, in press; see also Nosek & Hansen, 2008).”
Ingroup Experts and Peers as Social Vaccines Who Inoculate the Self-Concept: The Stereotype Inoculation Model (2011, unknown): “…of how social contexts affect personal decisions and/or social desirability concerns (Dasgupta, 2004, 2009; Ferguson & Bargh, 2007; Greenwald & Banaji, 1995; Greenwald et al., 2002; Nisbett & Wilson, 1977; Nosek & Hansen, 2008; Petty, Fazio, & Briñol, 2008; Wilson, Lindsey, & Schooler, 2000).”
Do smokers have a negative implicit attitude toward smoking? (2006, background): “Olson and Fazio (2004) presented evidence that these changes indeed reduce the impact of societal views on IAT scores (also see Han, Olson, & Fazio, in press; but see Nosek & Hansen, 2004).”
Racial bias and the validity of the Implicit Association Test (2016, background): “In doing so, I adapt the IAT for use in economics experiments in order to test its validity in identifying bias.”
The existence of implicit bias is beyond reasonable doubt: A refutation of ideological and methodological objections and executive summary of ten studies that no manager should ignore (2009, unknown): “Nevertheless, the decision-making outcomes were hardly egalitarian.”
The Surprisingly Limited Malleability of Implicit Racial Evaluations (2010, methodology): “In particular, the Project Implicit Virtual Laboratory has been used effectively for similar investigations (e.g., Bar-Anan, Nosek, & Vianello , 2009; Graham, Haidt, & Nosek, 2009; Lindner & Nosek, 2009; Nosek, 2005; Nosek & Hansen, 2008; Nosek, Smyth et al., 2007; Ranganath & Nosek, 2008).”
Implicit Attitudes and Beliefs Adapt to Situations: A Decade of Research on the Malleability of Implicit Prejudice, Stereotypes, and the Self-Concept (2013, background): “…of incomplete awareness of how social contexts affect personal decisions and/or social desirability concerns (Dasgupta, 2004, 2009; Ferguson & Bargh, 2007; Greenwald & Banaji, 1995; Greenwald et al., 2002; Nisbett & Wilson, 1977; Nosek & Hansen, 2008; Petty et al., 2008; Wilson et al., 2000).”
Explicit Evidence on the Import of Implicit Attitudes: The IAT and Immigration Policy Judgments (2010, background): “That the same individuals who score high on the IAT also support stricter immigration policies is more consistent with the view of implicit attitudes as individually endorsed attitudes, since they help predict one’s personal immigration policy preferences (Nosek and Hansen 2008; Ashburn-Nardo et al.”
Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. (2009, background): “At the conceptual level, it has been argued that the distinction between personal and societal views actually makes little sense, especially when one considers the automatic effects of these views (Banaji, 2001; Gawronski & Bodenhausen, 2006; Gawronski et al., 2008; Nosek & Hansen, 2008a).”
The Bias of Crowds: How Implicit Bias Bridges Personal and Systemic Prejudice (2017, unknown): “Implicit–explicit correlations are especially low for racial bias (e.g., Cameron, BrownIannuzzi, & Payne, 2012; Hofmann et al., 2005; Nosek, 2005, 2007; Nosek & Hansen, 2008; Nosek & Smyth, 2007).”
A History of Implicit Social Cognition Where Is It Coming From? Where Is It Now? Where Is It Going? (2010, unknown): “…(Bargh, Chaiken, Govender, & Pratto, 1992; Chaiken & Bargh, 1993; Fazio, 1993), and recent controversies about the role of personal versus extrapersonal associations in the IAT (Gawronski, Peters, & LeBel, 2008; Nosek & Hansen, 2008a, 2008b; Olson & Fazio, 2004; Olson, Fazio, & Han, 2009).”