Why researchers should think "real-time": A cognitive rationale.
By Norbert Schwarz. 2012
212 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1eee94fdad4eacffab6f76ddd8e7c54fb5fb8748
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Tamlin S. Conner
- Paul J Silvia
- Laurenz L. Meier
- Sven Gross
- Roger E. Beaty
- Emily C. Nusbaum
- T. Kashdan
- Yoed N. Kenett
Citations in the corpus
- Episodes of incivility between subordinates and supervisors: Examining the role of self‐control and time with an interaction‐record diary study. (2015, background): “On-time records of interaction episodes are well-suited to examining the dynamics of interactions, because they eliminate retrospection bias and minimize selectivity in reporting events (Schwarz, 2012).”
- Creative days: A daily diary study of emotion, personality, and everyday creativity. (2015, background): “…interview and self-report data, however, is that when people are asked to reflect about what they typically do, such as how much time they spend on creative pursuits, they are likely to draw upon their lay theories, recent memories, or bald guesses (Robinson & Clore, 2002; Schwarz, 2012).”