An Assessment of the Magnitude of Effect Sizes

By T. Paterson, P. D. Harms, Piers Steel, Marcus Crede. 2016

189 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7a7eb0b9c9713685a10104520b5730aacfd1fd2f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. D. van Knippenberg
2. M. Platow
3. Niklas K. Steffens
4. S. A. Haslam
5. Rolf van Dick
6. S. Cartwright
7. Stephen D. Reicher
8. Sherry Xin Li

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. D. van Knippenberg
2. M. Platow
3. S. A. Haslam
4. Rolf van Dick
5. S. Cartwright
6. Stephen D. Reicher
7. Sherry Xin Li
8. Yan Chen

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. M. Platow
2. S. A. Haslam
3. Niklas K. Steffens
4. K. Munt
5. D. van Knippenberg
6. Rolf van Dick
7. David de Cremer
8. M. Hogg

Citations in the corpus

• Advancing the social identity theory of leadership: A meta-analytic review of leader group prototypicality (2020, background): “…noting that the overall effect size of r ¼ .38 that we obtain from our analysis is substantially larger than the average effect size of r ¼ .29 found in a review of 69 leadership metaanalyses summarizing more than 2000 studies on a range of leadership variables and outcomes (Paterson et al., 2016).”