Can Charisma Be Taught? Tests of Two Interventions

332 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Charisma: An Ill-Defined and Ill-Measured Gift (2016, methodology): “Also, the gains that can be made are quite respectable, with a d = .62 (e.g., see Antonakis et al 2011).”
When Does Charisma Matter for Top-Level Leaders? Effect of Attributional Ambiguity (2014, methodology): “Thus, we did not code nonverbal charisma; however, indicators of nonverbal charisma (e.g., facial expressions, body language, use of voice) correlate strongly with the nine verbal strategies, (r = .48, p < .001, uncorrected for unreliablity, Antonakis et al., 2011).”
Charisma and organizational change: A multilevel study of perceived charisma, commitment to change, and team performance (2013, unknown): “, metaphors, anecdotes, and body gestures) are typically viewed as means that leaders can use to arouse followers' emotions, inspire them, and initiate collective action around a vision (Antonakis et al., 2011; Den Hartog & Verburg, 1997; Shamir, House, & Arthur, 1993).”
Charisma as signal: An evolutionary perspective on charismatic leadership (2017, result): “…& Henrich, 2010), and their variety of different signals to attract the attention of followers and amplify the effect of their own verbal and nonverbal cues, just as previous research has found that the more tactics managers used the more their charisma ratings improved (Antonakis et al., 2011).”