Organizational Learning: A Socio-Cognitive Framework

By Ali E. Akgün, Gary S. Lynn, John Byrne. 2003

246 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/797b560aa645c8b4bb5ff6dfb1065268c0336f35

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. Ali E. Akgün
2. Mark Easterby-Smith
3. E. Antonacopoulou
4. Chi-Cheng Huang

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Ali E. Akgün
2. Halit Keskin
3. John Byrne
4. Mark Easterby-Smith
5. Gary S. Lynn
6. Russ Vince

In Social Psychology

1. Halit Keskin
2. Ali E. Akgün
3. John Byrne
4. Gary S. Lynn
5. E. Antonacopoulou
6. Chi-Cheng Huang
7. Mumin Dayan

Citations in the corpus

• Learning Process in New Product Development Teams and Effects on Product Success: A Socio-Cognitive Perspective (2006, unknown): “Propose processes (Akgün et al., 2003; Meyers & Wilemon, 1989), which further indicates that the learning processes are more likely to be within the control of project management, the basic postulate of research is that each one of these constructs is critical for the team learning process in a nomo”
• Organizational Intelligence: A Structuration View (2007, background): “Organizational intelligence is an inherently social process[2] (Glynn, 1996; Akgün et al., 2003), in which building theories of organizational intelligence based on theories of individual intelligence alone tends to ignore.”
• Organizational unlearning as changes in beliefs and routines in organizations (2007, background): “” One of the reasons for this confusion is that most of the arguments on the unlearning has been conducted in the organizational learning literature ( Akgun et al. , 2003”
• Absorptive Capacity: A Process Perspective (2008, background): “Theoretically, it is located between the fi elds of dynamic capability (Teece et al., 1997; Zollo and Winter, 2002), organizational learning (Akgun et al., 2003; Easterby-Smith, 1997) and knowledge management (Chiva and Allegre, 2005; Oshri et al., 2006).”
• The Effect of Absorptive Capacity on Innovativeness: Context and Information Systems Capability as Catalysts (2010, unknown): “The measures relating to consolidating the emergent understandings consisted of six items taken from a scale designed by Cegarra and Sánchez (2008) and adapted from Akgün et al. (2007). These items describe the way management faces up to change, actively introduces it into the company through projec”