Education at a Glance--OECD Indicators 1998 Edition;: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, Paris, 1998, 432 pages, soft cover, $49.00 (FF 295; DM 88)

By E. Cohn. 2000

356 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Growth and educational levels: a comparative analysis (2002, neutral): “…=real gross private investment as a percentage of GDP for the years 1978 and 1990; the data for the OECD groups were from the “Economic outlook” section in OECD (1997b) and IMF (1997); and for the LDC group, OECD (1996); EDit−12 =the completion rate of the ith educational level (e.g. i=1 for…”
Formative Assessment and its Relevance to Retention (2001, background): “…front, comparative completion rates for a number of countries have been produced for some years by the OECD (for the most recent example, see OECD, 2000), though these tables have to be interpreted with reference to particular national contexts since like is not necessarily being compared…”
How do politicians use performance information? An analysis of the Norwegian local government experience (2007, background): “On this indicator, Norway has, by some margin, the highest level of education among OECD countries (OECD, 2006).”
Social democrats and the new partisan politics of public investment in education (2009, neutral): “2 The OECD distinguishes public spending on educational institutions (narrow definition of education spending) from ‘total public expenditure on education’ (OECD 2006: 222), which includes education-related public subsidies to households.”