Relationship of core self-evaluations to goal setting, motivation, and performance.

By A. Erez, T. Judge. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001

785 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/78ea5ad592a1c33803e7c52f155fc91445990585

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Adam M. Grant
2. T. Judge
3. Fred Luthans
4. James Avey
5. A. Hirschi
6. J. Kammeyer-Mueller
7. H. Zacher
8. B. Joo

In Clinical Psychology

1. T. Judge
2. Fred Luthans
3. James Avey
4. B. Roberts
5. A. Hirschi
6. J. Kammeyer-Mueller
7. Adam M. Grant
8. J. Bono

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. T. Judge
2. Adam M. Grant
3. H. Zacher
4. Edwin A. Locke
5. B. Roberts
6. A. Hirschi
7. J. Bono
8. Gary P. Latham

Citations in the corpus

• Core self-evaluations in Japan: relative effects on job satisfaction, life satisfaction, and happiness (2005, methodology): “Studies that have compared the explanatory power of the broad CSE concept to each of the specific traits have tended to show the core trait as a more valuable predictor (Erez & Judge, 2001; Judge et al., 2002).”
• High Core Self-Evaluators Maintain Creativity (2014, background): “We hope that our investigation and other pioneering work in the personality arena (e.g., Erez & Judge, 2001; Kacmar et al., 2009) will inspire further CSE research in a variety of contexts, thus producing a comprehensive picture of CSE’s buffering role in reducing the negative impacts of deviant…”
• Personality across working life: The longitudinal and reciprocal influences of personality on work (2013, background): “This reflects a process by which people with higher self-efficacy and self-esteem tend to set themselves and accept more challenging goals and tasks, and be more motivated to achieve them (Bono & Judge, 2003; Erez & Judge, 2001).”
• Developing and Evaluating the Social Axioms Survey in Eleven Countries (2012, background): “Fu et al. (2004) found that across several cultural groups, reward for application was related to the rated effectiveness of influence tactics that involved noncoercive persuasion.”
• Personality and teamwork behavior in context: The cross‐level moderating role of collective efficacy (2011, background): “Drawing on this work and the premise that CSE reflects a predisposition to engage in goal-directed behavior (e.g., Erez & Judge, 2001; Johnson et al., 2008), we submit that individuals higher in CSE will be more likely to demonstrate teamwork behaviors that encourage performance regulation in the…”
• Explaining the Under-Representation of Women in Leadership Positions of Sport Organizations: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective (2007, background): “Perhaps the most important implication of the self concept, as constructed by Judge and colleagues (Erez & Judge, 2001; Judge et al., 1997; Judge et al., 1998; Judge & Bono, 2001; Judge et al., 2002, 2004), to the current model is the inclusion of the generalized self-efficacy trait.”
• Investigating the influences of core self‐evaluations, job autonomy, and intrinsic motivation on in‐role job performance (2010, methodology): “Accumulating evidence suggests that core self-evaluations have been linked to job satisfaction, motivation, and performance (e.g., Bowling, Wang, Tang, & Kennedy, 2010; DeCarlo & Agarwal, 1999; Erez & Judge, 2001; Grant & Wrzesniewski, 2010; Judge & Bono, 2001; Judge, Locke, Durham, & Kluger, 1998).”
• Entrepreneurship as a career choice: The impact of locus of control on aspiring entrepreneurs' opportunity recognition (2019, background): “Previous scholars (Ardichvili et al., 2003; Erez & Judge, 2001) have argued that personality plays an important role in these career decisions.”
• The effect of physical height on workplace success and income: preliminary test of a theoretical model. (2004, background): “Self-esteem, confidence, and poise are assets on most jobs and lead to enhanced job performance (Erez & Judge, 2001).”
• Implications of core self-evaluations for a changing organizational context (2011, methodology): “Erez and Judge (2001) and Judge et al. (2002) found that putting these four traits together did a better job of predicting outcomes than using the traits separately as predictors.”
• Mindfulness Meditation Impairs Task Motivation but Not Performance (2018, methodology): “This task was chosen because anagrams are challenging for most people but do not require specialized knowledge, and are often used in experiments on goal setting and motivation (e.g., Erez & Judge, 2001; Locke, Shaw, Saari, & Latham, 1981).”
• Emerging Positive Organizational Behavior (2007, background): “…have been shown to be significant positive predictors of goal setting, motivation, performance, job and life satisfaction, and other desirable outcomes (Erez & Judge, 2001; Judge & Bono, 2001; Judge, Bono, & Locke, 2000; Judge, Locke, Durham, & Kluger, 1998; Judge, Van Vianen, & De Pater, 2004).”