The Four Basic Social Bonds: Structures for Coordinating Interaction.
By Alan Page Fiske, Nick Haslam. 2005
87 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/785320f6188acee65329bec18f8e056e4072c0c9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Francesca Gino
- Max H. Bazerman
- Jonathan Hildreth
- M. D. Angelis
- Hettie A. Richardson
- K. Mossholder
- Randall P. Settoon
- Celia Moore
Citations in the corpus
- Human Resource Systems and Helping in Organizations: A Relational Perspective (2011, background): “People blur individual distinctions in interactions over time, and the personal welfare of the other party is considered significant above self-concerns (Fiske & Haslam, 2005).”
- Blind loyalty? When group loyalty makes us see evil or engage in it (2016, background): “…one of ‘‘the Big Three [codes] of Morality” that Shweder, Much, Mahapatra, and Park (1997) contend drive human action (the others being autonomy and divinity) and within Fiske et al.’s relational models approach to moral action (Fiske, 1991, 1992, 2004; Fiske & Haslam, 2005; Rai & Fiske, 2011).”
- Moral psychology is relationship regulation: moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality. (2011, unknown): “Fiske (1991, 1992, 2000; Fiske & Haslam, 2005) proposed relational models theory (RMT) as a means for understanding and characterizing motivated coordination of social relationships.”
- Omnia Sunt Communia: On the Commons and the Transformation to Postcapitalism (2017, background): “If communal labour is mostly based on the principle of community sharing, both in terms of labour and the products of labour, 216 COMMONING as for example the sharing of a meal and music, reciprocal labour is based on principles of equality matching (EM) (Fiske 1990; Fiske and Haslam 2005).”