Blind loyalty? When group loyalty makes us see evil or engage in it

By Jonathan Hildreth, Francesca Gino, Max H. Bazerman. 2016

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/83ed2e855ffc36a3586c88cefeca6785a177e31f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. David Pascual-Ezama
2. Catrine Jacobsen
3. Toke Reinholt Fosgaard

In Information Systems and Management

1. David Pascual-Ezama
2. Catrine Jacobsen
3. Toke Reinholt Fosgaard

In Sociology and Political Science

1. David Pascual-Ezama
2. Catrine Jacobsen
3. Toke Reinholt Fosgaard

Citations in the corpus

• Why Do We Lie? A Practical Guide To The Dishonesty Literature (2018, background): “Hildreth et al. (2016) showed that increased loyalty actually makes people behave more honestly, unless they are put in a competitive situation, which makes loyal people more likely to cheat to benefit the group.”
• Requiem for a Nudge: Framing effects in nudging honesty (2020, unknown): “Literature related to our research agenda has successfully used variants of cheating paradigms and/or norm-nudge interventions on MTurk (Peer et al., 2014; Hildreth et al., 2016; Bicchieri et al., 2019b; Bolton et al., 2019; Charness et al., 2019).”