Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability

3,138 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Coding In-depth Semistructured Interviews (2013, background): “2 For example, Lombard, Snyder-Duch, and Bracken (2002) reviewed 137 research articles based on content analysis of various sorts including interviews.”
Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data (2007, background): “This complexity combined with the lack of consensus among communication researchers on which measures are appropriate led Lombard, Snyder-Duch, and Bracken (2002, 2004) to call for a reliability standard that can span the variable nature of available data.”
An integrative review of sport-based youth development literature (2017, background): “…and latent content, since manifest content simply requires cataloguing surface elements (i.e. authorship), while latent content requires coding for subjective interpretations influenced by the coder’s mental schema (Lombard, Snyder-Duch, and Bracken 2002; Potter and Levine-Donnerstein 1999).”
A reconceptualization of fear of failure in entrepreneurship (2016, methodology): “We calculated the percentage of agreement as an index of reliability used for content analysis (Lombard et al., 2002; Duriau et al., 2007).”
Making the Most of Failure Experiences: Exploring the Relationship between Business Failure and the Identification of Business Opportunities (2016, neutral): “These results indicate high levels of interrater reliability (cf. Fleiss, 1981; Lombard et al., 2002; Neuendorf, 2002).”